Seems Wikipedia loves Scrappy-doo one of the worst character in any medium ever created, the artitle at this time of writing is 167,696 bytes of data
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrappy-Doo

And when I thought wikipedia couldn't be worse. Then they manage to outdo themselves.

and talk about more needless bio pic of living inviduals and article about Buisnesswoman from Kenya that nobody has ever heard off. Wouldn't be surprised if that article was created in self promotion. : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racheal_Njoroge

IF you want know all about the masters of the Royal Household here is crap wiki artilce on the subject https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_of_the_Household I have no clue after going through that article whats up or down in Royal Household. Any way this type of article that would not get approved f...

I thought website called wikipediasucks was place to tell the truth on wikipedia.

Red links everywhere:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Stegana_species

Here is an article on obscure open software, it looks like an adwert if you ask me.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobicents

Yes, ANOTHER tv show on streaming that Wikipedia had never heard of. Routine. Screenshot_2021-02-07 The Snoopy Show at DuckDuckGo.png Considering that there are quite lot on the Penuts on wikipedia its surprise this is not mentioned at al on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peanuts_filmography and doe...

Jimbopedia that would be more correct reflection what wikipedia actually is.

Appart from invidual articles Hoaxes on WP, it must be said that the biggest hoax peretuated by Wikipedia is that WP pretends to be a reputable encylopedia. Why? Well WP is collection on various poorly organized and written articles (there are some good articles on there inbetween mind you). Were so...