some other forum. not really bothered by it but thought i recognized the name kumioko
We are all Kumioko
-
- Sucks Fan
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:33 am
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: We are all Kumioko
Support Firefox https://donate.mozilla.org/en-US/
-
- Sucker
- Posts: 1402
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
- Location: The Astral Plane
- Has thanked: 1462 times
- Been thanked: 293 times
Re: We are all Kumioko
Wikipediocracy? Or something else?oranges33 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 03, 2023 4:04 amsome other forum. not really bothered by it but thought i recognized the name kumioko
Kumioko said a while ago that there were people impersonating him, so it could have been that.
https://genderdesk.wordpress.com/2019/1 ... underdome/
GenderDesk wrote: [...]
Now I get it. The forum has a “foe” feature that lets you turn off comments from people you want to ignore. You only see them if someone else quotes it as a part of their own post. So no one wants to “foe” Kumioko. They want to take him seriously. They just don’t want him spamming the forum, as they claim he has been spamming email lists. Although this might just be a joe job…it is also claimed there are now one or more Kumioko impersonators: people in the U.S. military establishment who are sympathetic, because they have gotten some help from Kumioko in the past in dealing with their own Wikipedia issues.
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.
-
- Sucks Mod
- Posts: 860
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 11:54 pm
- Has thanked: 43 times
- Been thanked: 177 times
Re: We are all Kumioko
Without actually knowing who they are on Wikipedia, and I'm certainly not advocating they out themselves, it's hard to say but I have certainly called a few editors a creep. A couple I have referred to as a creep are Drmies, Beyond My Ken and Fae but there may be others I don't remember. As was mentioned before I was the target of a few Joe Job accounts as well, but I suspect if they say I called them a creep, it's probably true and for a good reason.
#BbbGate
-
- Sucks Fan
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:33 am
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: We are all Kumioko
Thinking about starting a wiki that only allows people who are globally locked from wikipedia. Think I read somewhere else that you met that at least that requirement. Would also wanna ban pedos from this wiki tho so not sure how many would be left after that.Kumioko wrote: ↑Mon Jul 03, 2023 9:24 pmWithout actually knowing who they are on Wikipedia, and I'm certainly not advocating they out themselves, it's hard to say but I have certainly called a few editors a creep. A couple I have referred to as a creep are Drmies, Beyond My Ken and Fae but there may be others I don't remember. As was mentioned before I was the target of a few Joe Job accounts as well, but I suspect if they say I called them a creep, it's probably true and for a good reason.
Support Firefox https://donate.mozilla.org/en-US/
-
- Sucks Mod
- Posts: 860
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2017 11:54 pm
- Has thanked: 43 times
- Been thanked: 177 times
Re: We are all Kumioko
I think your confusing global lock with global ban. A lot more people are locked than get banned. But, i wouldn't create a wiki just for them. A lot are blocked for good reasons like vandalism, copyright violations.
I you want to create a wiki i would pick a topic your interested in and invite people to participate. If you get some banned or blocked editors from Wikimedia then great, but i woukdnt assume that.
I you want to create a wiki i would pick a topic your interested in and invite people to participate. If you get some banned or blocked editors from Wikimedia then great, but i woukdnt assume that.
#BbbGate
-
- Sucks Admin
- Posts: 4876
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
- Location: The ass-tral plane
- Has thanked: 1267 times
- Been thanked: 1996 times
Re: We are all Kumioko
lol, less than you think.....oranges33 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 04, 2023 7:00 pmThinking about starting a wiki that only allows people who are globally locked from wikipedia. Think I read somewhere else that you met that at least that requirement. Would also wanna ban pedos from this wiki tho so not sure how many would be left after that.
-
- Sucks Fan
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2022 5:33 am
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: We are all Kumioko
I've done that. The wikis I created still get hundreds of thousands of views a month. I'd advise you do that instead of editing Wikipedia if you have the energy.
My wikis are in the hands of others now, and don't have the interest to create anything other than small joke websites.
Support Firefox https://donate.mozilla.org/en-US/
-
- Sucker
- Posts: 1402
- Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
- Location: The Astral Plane
- Has thanked: 1462 times
- Been thanked: 293 times
Re: We are all Kumioko
Why not have an independent one instead? Fandom is still run by Jimbo's cronies and, worse, is run by a for-profit corporation. Tons of ads too.
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.
-
- Sucks
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2020 12:54 pm
- Has thanked: 20 times
- Been thanked: 25 times
Re: We are all Kumioko
Thats not the only problem I have with fandom but the fact that fandom editor sucks even worse than Wikipedia.Bbb23sucks wrote: ↑Tue Jul 11, 2023 1:13 amWhy not have an independent one instead? Fandom is still run by Jimbo's cronies and, worse, is run by a for-profit corporation. Tons of ads too.