"NoFap" on Wikipedia

[Bbb23sucks]

This seems interesting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... tgeorgescu

[ericbarbour]

This seems interesting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... tgeorgescu

Okay, that's interesting -- but you should look thru the archives of Tamzin's talkpage to see how much INSANITY she attracts. And always has. Look at the oldest archive from 2012; it [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... #Charles35 starts out] with her (under an old username) reverting someone who was editing his own biography. An excellent example of "wikilawyering".

Wikipedia has NEVER handled subjects relating to adult sexuality rationally. It reminds me, first off, of Guy Chapman grinding out articles about large-breasted adult film stars. He started doing that in 2007 and for all I can tell, is still doing it today (when he's not deleting something, which is 90% of what he does today). I'd point you to examples but he's had large quantities of his edit history obliterated, and most of those adult-film performer articles were also deleted for "lack of notability".

Remember: far worse battles have happened on Commons. Most of the NOTCENSORED lunatics who were posting closeups of genitals and occasional pedophilic imagery eventually gave up and left. You really should go thru Commons to see some really sleazy dealings.

Is it still there? Yes it is.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cate ... econd_Life

[Bbb23sucks]

This seems interesting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... tgeorgescu

Okay, that's interesting -- but you should look thru the archives of Tamzin's talkpage to see how much INSANITY she attracts. And always has. Look at the oldest archive from 2012; it [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... #Charles35 starts out] with her (under an old username) reverting someone who was editing his own biography. An excellent example of "wikilawyering".

Wikipedia has NEVER handled subjects relating to adult sexuality rationally. It reminds me, first off, of Guy Chapman grinding out articles about large-breasted adult film stars. He started doing that in 2007 and for all I can tell, is still doing it today (when he's not deleting something, which is 90% of what he does today). I'd point you to examples but he's had large quantities of his edit history obliterated, and most of those adult-film performer articles were also deleted for "lack of notability".

Remember: far worse battles have happened on Commons. Most of the NOTCENSORED lunatics who were posting closeups of genitals and occasional pedophilic imagery eventually gave up and left. You really should go thru Commons to see some really sleazy dealings.

Is it still there? Yes it is.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cate ... econd_Life

Oh no. It was oversighted and I was in a rush and forgot to make a copy or archive it. Do you happen to have taken a copy? Yes I'm an idiot I know.

[Bbb23sucks]

This seems interesting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... tgeorgescu

Okay, that's interesting -- but you should look thru the archives of Tamzin's talkpage to see how much INSANITY she attracts. And always has. Look at the oldest archive from 2012; it [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... #Charles35 starts out] with her (under an old username) reverting someone who was editing his own biography. An excellent example of "wikilawyering".

Wikipedia has NEVER handled subjects relating to adult sexuality rationally. It reminds me, first off, of Guy Chapman grinding out articles about large-breasted adult film stars. He started doing that in 2007 and for all I can tell, is still doing it today (when he's not deleting something, which is 90% of what he does today). I'd point you to examples but he's had large quantities of his edit history obliterated, and most of those adult-film performer articles were also deleted for "lack of notability".

Remember: far worse battles have happened on Commons. Most of the NOTCENSORED lunatics who were posting closeups of genitals and occasional pedophilic imagery eventually gave up and left. You really should go thru Commons to see some really sleazy dealings.

Is it still there? Yes it is.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cate ... econd_Life

Oh no. It was oversighted and I was in a rush and forgot to make a copy or archive it. Do you happen to have taken a copy? Yes I'm an idiot I know.

The OP got BSed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Keyhound

[journo]

This seems interesting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... tgeorgescu

Okay, that's interesting -- but you should look thru the archives of Tamzin's talkpage to see how much INSANITY she attracts. And always has. Look at the oldest archive from 2012; it [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... #Charles35 starts out] with her (under an old username) reverting someone who was editing his own biography. An excellent example of "wikilawyering".

Wikipedia has NEVER handled subjects relating to adult sexuality rationally. It reminds me, first off, of Guy Chapman grinding out articles about large-breasted adult film stars. He started doing that in 2007 and for all I can tell, is still doing it today (when he's not deleting something, which is 90% of what he does today). I'd point you to examples but he's had large quantities of his edit history obliterated, and most of those adult-film performer articles were also deleted for "lack of notability".

Remember: far worse battles have happened on Commons. Most of the NOTCENSORED lunatics who were posting closeups of genitals and occasional pedophilic imagery eventually gave up and left. You really should go thru Commons to see some really sleazy dealings.

Is it still there? Yes it is.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cate ... econd_Life

Oh no. It was oversighted and I was in a rush and forgot to make a copy or archive it. Do you happen to have taken a copy? Yes I'm an idiot I know.

What happened on it? Yea I have a feeling someone or some people on WP is following you around everywhere. One reason being someone seems to have archived the shit out of your posts on this forum. This even extended to someone archiving when certain people liked certain posts of yours.

[Bbb23sucks]

Okay, that's interesting -- but you should look thru the archives of Tamzin's talkpage to see how much INSANITY she attracts. And always has. Look at the oldest archive from 2012; it [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... #Charles35 starts out] with her (under an old username) reverting someone who was editing his own biography. An excellent example of "wikilawyering".

Wikipedia has NEVER handled subjects relating to adult sexuality rationally. It reminds me, first off, of Guy Chapman grinding out articles about large-breasted adult film stars. He started doing that in 2007 and for all I can tell, is still doing it today (when he's not deleting something, which is 90% of what he does today). I'd point you to examples but he's had large quantities of his edit history obliterated, and most of those adult-film performer articles were also deleted for "lack of notability".

Remember: far worse battles have happened on Commons. Most of the NOTCENSORED lunatics who were posting closeups of genitals and occasional pedophilic imagery eventually gave up and left. You really should go thru Commons to see some really sleazy dealings.

Is it still there? Yes it is.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Cate ... econd_Life

Oh no. It was oversighted and I was in a rush and forgot to make a copy or archive it. Do you happen to have taken a copy? Yes I'm an idiot I know.

What happened on it? Yea I have a feeling someone or some people on WP is following you around everywhere. One reason being someone seems to have archived the shit out of your posts on this forum. This even extended to someone archiving when certain people liked certain posts of yours.

Do you think it's a sock of davidp?

[Bbb23sucks]

The OP got BSed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Keyhound

Assume Bad Faith working very well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk ... _apologies

[Bbb23sucks]

Oh no. It was oversighted and I was in a rush and forgot to make a copy or archive it. Do you happen to have taken a copy? Yes I'm an idiot I know.

Most of the important information can be found in a later post that was not OSed: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... st_removal

[Bbb23sucks]

Oh no. It was oversighted and I was in a rush and forgot to make a copy or archive it. Do you happen to have taken a copy? Yes I'm an idiot I know.

Most of the important information can be found in a later post that was not OSed: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... st_removal

Was RevDeled. Archive: https://archive.is/cYLae

[ericbarbour]

thanks, and in case nobody noticed it:

tamzin-talks-to-self.png (30.42 KiB) Viewed 26230 times