Search found 4171 matches

by ericbarbour
Wed Mar 01, 2017 12:01 am
Forum: Dark Corners -- a place for odd and deviant subjects (WP related or not)
Topic: NIck Bostrom is a looney, okay?
Replies: 7
Views: 5601

Re: NIck Bostrom is a looney, okay?

From a 2014 Wikipediocracy thread which I started: "And this reminds me of one of the most crank-ish transhumanists I've ever run across: Eliezer Yudkowsky..... "Yes, kids, that's right; Yudkowsky runs LessWrong , a forum where Singulatarians hang out, and rave at each other incoherently. ...
by ericbarbour
Tue Feb 28, 2017 11:12 pm
Forum: Dark Corners -- a place for odd and deviant subjects (WP related or not)
Topic: NIck Bostrom is a looney, okay?
Replies: 7
Views: 5601

NIck Bostrom is a looney, okay?

He's the philosopher who, in 2003, put out the serious idea that we live in a giant computer simulation. (Before that it was kicked around by science fiction writers like Philip Dick, but only their fans took it seriously.) Unquestionably Bostrom is a smart fellow, but there are some things I'd like...
by ericbarbour
Tue Feb 28, 2017 10:49 pm
Forum: Dark Corners -- a place for odd and deviant subjects (WP related or not)
Topic: The (new, straight-from-scratch) Trump thread
Replies: 371
Views: 193020

Re: The (new, straight-from-scratch) Trump thread

I bet r/the_donald is snarling about this right now--and organizing "raids" on it.

https://www.reddit.com/r/TinyTrumps/
by ericbarbour
Tue Feb 28, 2017 8:11 am
Forum: Wikipedia In The Media
Topic: "The best tools to improve your Wikipedia experience"
Replies: 2
Views: 2669

Re: "The best tools to improve your Wikipedia experience"

The Register had a way out last year, but it involved the ideas of Andreas Kolbe; namely either pay editors for their work (while ending anonymity at Wikipedia), or rig Wikipedia so it can be a source for infoboxes even though that will help along the "citogenesis" problem. And you will n...
by ericbarbour
Tue Feb 28, 2017 7:38 am
Forum: Dark Corners -- a place for odd and deviant subjects (WP related or not)
Topic: Randomated images
Replies: 2
Views: 3617

Re: Randomated images

watches.jpg
watches.jpg (36.2 KiB) Viewed 3572 times
by ericbarbour
Tue Feb 28, 2017 7:32 am
Forum: Dark Corners -- a place for odd and deviant subjects (WP related or not)
Topic: The (new, straight-from-scratch) Trump thread
Replies: 371
Views: 193020

Re: The (new, straight-from-scratch) Trump thread

Anyone care to place a bet that the High Oompa Loompa will either invade a Middle Eastern country, or a major terrorist attack will occur on U.S. soil, within the next six months? And that a surge of blind patriotism will raise his approval figures? I would not be surprised if Mr. Bannon is trying t...
by ericbarbour
Tue Feb 28, 2017 6:27 am
Forum: Content Issues
Topic: Re: Paid Editing on WP is permissible
Replies: 349
Views: 214078

Re: Paid Editing on WP is permissible

m created in April 2013 by m And never repaired. He was blocked as a sockpuppet but no one gave a shit about the obvious paid content he did. In fact you can go thru this category and find ample paid editing. m According to most Wikipedia content, nothing bad ever happens in the jewelry industry; wh...
by ericbarbour
Mon Feb 27, 2017 10:22 pm
Forum: Wikipedians
Topic: Larry Sanger: "The Moral Bankruptcy of Wikipedia Admins"
Replies: 3
Views: 3771

Re: Larry Sanger: "The Moral Bankruptcy of Wikipedia Admins"

All correct. Jimbo set the tone after Larry was pushed out--and Jimbo wanted BAD people in charge. He got them. Wanna be an administrator, in a SERIOUS way? Move to London and befriend Jimmy. Suck his little ego deep and hard for a couple of years and he'll hand great power over to you (on that mise...
by ericbarbour
Mon Feb 27, 2017 10:16 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Active Editors on Wikipedia -*XYZ ARCHIVED*-
Replies: 5
Views: 4826

Re: Active Editors on Wikipedia -*XYZ ARCHIVED*-

Thanks for reposting that. I might also point this out: m There are 1,275 (as of now) administrator accounts (active and otherwise), 577 of them active (as of 2017-02-27). FYI: English Wikipedia has not had so few active administrators since 2005. Things are REALLY bad. Dozens more either quit or ar...