Search found 433 matches

by Ognistysztorm
Wed Mar 12, 2025 10:55 pm
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Do not frequent some certain default subs if you don't wanna get banned while criticizing Wikipedia on Reddit
Replies: 4
Views: 1502

Re: Do not frequent some certain default subs if you don't wanna get banned while criticizing Wikipedia on Reddit

UPDATE: Abrownn has reached out and denied any involvement of the spurious bans. The post thread will get retracted once hard proofs confirming their claim(s) are received.
by Ognistysztorm
Wed Mar 12, 2025 3:23 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Do not frequent some certain default subs if you don't wanna get banned while criticizing Wikipedia on Reddit
Replies: 4
Views: 1502

Re: Do not frequent some certain default subs if you don't wanna get banned while criticizing Wikipedia on Reddit

Bbb23sucks wrote:
Wed Mar 12, 2025 3:18 am
You can post on alt subs like stupidpol, TrueAnon, etc.
That's right. Besides that, major Jewish community subs have become anti-Wikipedia beachheads on Reddit ever since the exposure of the Holocaust distortions on Wikipedia two years ago.
by Ognistysztorm
Wed Mar 12, 2025 2:57 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Do not frequent some certain default subs if you don't wanna get banned while criticizing Wikipedia on Reddit
Replies: 4
Views: 1502

Re: Do not frequent some certain default subs if you don't wanna get banned while criticizing Wikipedia on Reddit

This was the earlier ban by /r/technology on a now-closed personal account after posting anti-Wikipedia stuff there.
4.PNG
4.PNG (14.2 KiB) Viewed 1479 times
by Ognistysztorm
Wed Mar 12, 2025 2:44 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Do not frequent some certain default subs if you don't wanna get banned while criticizing Wikipedia on Reddit
Replies: 4
Views: 1502

Do not frequent some certain default subs if you don't wanna get banned while criticizing Wikipedia on Reddit

Do not frequent some certain default subs if you don't wanna get banned while criticizing Wikipedia on Reddit. There's a mod who's been abusing their powers by censoring anyone on sight if they criticize Wikipedia in any way. r/videos r/gadgets r/technology r/listentothis r/interestingasfuck r/MadeM...
by Ognistysztorm
Thu Mar 06, 2025 11:24 pm
Forum: Wikipedia In The Media
Topic: "The Right Takes Aim at Wikipedia"
Replies: 6
Views: 4050

Re: "The Right Takes Aim at Wikipedia"

Yet another Stephen Harrison mash note to the WMF and its wacko supporters: https://slate.com/technology/2025/02/wikipedia-project-2025-heritage-foundation-doxing-editors-antisemitism.html The free encyclopedia will become too toxic to sustain. IT ALREADY WAS, YOU LITTLE SHIT. Abuse and dirty trick...
by Ognistysztorm
Thu Mar 06, 2025 11:23 pm
Forum: Content Issues
Topic: Less than 15% of the American population trusts established news outlets
Replies: 10
Views: 3562

Re: Less than 15% of the American population trusts established news outlets

I don't understand why an Encyclopedia has to have articles on non-established topics. (or why anyone would read them) Would probably do them well to delete all their articles on things after at least the 1990s Yeah, dream on. Not happening. WP was started by "somewhat sane" people, but they left i...
by Ognistysztorm
Sat Mar 01, 2025 1:42 am
Forum: General Discussion
Topic: Was Wikipedia manipulated as part of the Blake Lively smear campaign?
Replies: 4
Views: 3372

Re: Was Wikipedia manipulated as part of the Blake Lively smear campaign?

All the classic signs of undeclared paid/COI editing for a client. Kjersti Flaa reeks of it. I seriously question whether this BLP will survive an AFD. And predictably, Baldoni's article is a constant target of edit warring. Just gets longer and not better. The legal battle will eventually be the B...
by Ognistysztorm
Fri Feb 21, 2025 9:14 pm
Forum: Wikipedia In The Media
Topic: "The Right Takes Aim at Wikipedia"
Replies: 6
Views: 4050

Re: "The Right Takes Aim at Wikipedia"

4 Wikipedia editors booked over factual inaccuracies about Chhatrapati Sambhaji
https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-ne ... 00722.html