Search found 75 matches
- Fri Sep 01, 2023 7:55 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Dronebogus
- Replies: 89
- Views: 8992
Re: Dronebogus
I have not, although I intend to. I'm in touch with a couple of publications that are interested in this topic. One of them said they wanted to "help me take down Wikipedia" , so that's encouraging. If anything I write gets published, I will post it on this forum. As for self-publishing, I haven' do...
- Sun Aug 27, 2023 4:12 am
- Forum: Political
- Topic: Political bias and squabbling
- Replies: 43
- Views: 12252
Re: Political bias and squabbling
A conspiracy theory, to the average Wikipedian, is whatever they are told is a conspiracy theory by the 'reliable sources'. Are you folks aware of the wiki-slogan " Verifiability is truth "? That may be the winner of the most Orwellian sentence I've ever seen someone write unironically on the intern...
- Fri Aug 25, 2023 6:46 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Dronebogus
- Replies: 89
- Views: 8992
Re: Dronebogus
I was able to find it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1136#Dronebogus_doesn't_like_IP_editing . Indeed, Dronebogus is a useful idiot. The reason his behavior is tolerated is that he has never, and will never, make an edit that The Party woul...
- Fri Aug 25, 2023 5:33 am
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Dronebogus
- Replies: 89
- Views: 8992
Re: Dronebogus
Sure, I'll write you a PM.
- Fri Aug 25, 2023 1:17 am
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Dronebogus
- Replies: 89
- Views: 8992
Re: Dronebogus
Hello everyone. First post here. I'm very concerned about what's happened to Wikipedia, and I'm very, very happy to find a group of people with similar concerns. I've been thinking about this issue for years and recently began writing essays about it. If anybody who reads this is serious about a pla...