Search found 15 matches
- Mon May 15, 2017 3:02 am
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Greg Kohs has been WMF globally banned
- Replies: 31
- Views: 23594
Re: Greg Kohs has been WMF globally banned
We had decided to exit Auggie's forum for the identical abusive language and hostility GS displayed to us and which Auggie and the other mods there strangely tolerated. Auggie is tolerant of a certain class of shit-disturber for whom content is a minor issue... GS was running a meat farm over at NL...
- Sun May 14, 2017 7:42 am
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Greg Kohs has been WMF globally banned
- Replies: 31
- Views: 23594
Re: Greg Kohs has been WMF globally banned
GraafStatler is a meatpuppet of another banned user. Got any further evidence? Just curious. If he's running a sock farm, this is just another futile attempt by the WMF to purge sock farms they don't like. I ran his blog post thru G-Translate - this happened on nl-WP. He was forced out by Natuur12,...
- Sat May 13, 2017 4:53 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Greg Kohs has been WMF globally banned
- Replies: 31
- Views: 23594
Re: Greg Kohs has been WMF globally banned
I'm not going soft on Kohs, but I give him credit for looking into the situation of Graaf Statler, the guy who was banned at the same time he was. Kohs pointed out that Statler seems to have a blog post in Dutch explaining why he's so pissed at Wikipedia. Here's the blog post in Dutch: m. Statler h...
- Sat Apr 08, 2017 4:15 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Does this seem legit?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 9922
Re: Does this seem legit?
Of course Jytdog is paid to edit. He is a Q-ship. Its just too convenient for the Wiki paid editor rogues to have a paid shill for big pharma acting as the opposition to them instead of an uncompromising hardline 'Inlinetext'. Par for the course when Jimbo Wales does paid edits for free sex. Oh com...
- Fri Apr 07, 2017 4:51 am
- Forum: Dark Corners -- a place for odd and deviant subjects (WP related or not)
- Topic: Re: Random thoughts on Wikipedia's blocking policy
- Replies: 19
- Views: 15448
Re: Random thoughts on Wikipedia's blocking policy
1. could you confirm whether this thread contained the problematic posts? m 2. I complained about HRA because of the repeated filthy and foul language he was using, and I did so publicly on the forum. I never asked for HRA to be blocked. I just wanted them to stop abusing me repeatedly. 3. The arti...
- Thu Apr 06, 2017 4:37 pm
- Forum: Dark Corners -- a place for odd and deviant subjects (WP related or not)
- Topic: Re: Random thoughts on Wikipedia's blocking policy
- Replies: 19
- Views: 15448
Re: Random thoughts on Wikipedia's blocking policy
One of these two names is the name of the person who allegedly hired Toby Dollman to complain to ProBoards. Why not just tell everyone at this point, HRA? #1 "Kato" is HRA1924 on auggie's forum and was HRA node11 on WS-1 #2 HRA on sucks.co was HRA on WS-1 #3 Wikipediacritics (Inc.) is the...
- Wed Apr 05, 2017 6:03 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Email of a blocked user to ARBCOM (copied from another blog)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6481
Re: Email of a blocked user to ARBCOM (copied from another b
Inlinetext has posted on a private blog of Wikipedia users, which is automatically emailed to me. 1 That they have received an arbcom list acknowldgement 2 The text of their email to some Dr. Aaij From: Inline Text <i...@g...c..> Subject: A caution and advice concerning Wikipedia edits To: maaij1@au...
- Wed Apr 05, 2017 4:43 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Email of a blocked user to ARBCOM (copied from another blog)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6481
Re: Email of a blocked user to ARBCOM (copied from another b
Email of a blocked user to ARBCOM (Fair Use copied from another blog) To: The Arbitration Committee EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG <arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org> Date: 04 March 2017 .. .. .. ... .... ..... sincerely USER:INLINETEXT I'm guessing ArbCom didn't satisfactorily respond within 48 hours a...
- Wed Apr 05, 2017 4:18 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Email of a blocked user to ARBCOM (copied from another blog)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6481
Re: Email of a blocked user to ARBCOM (copied from another b
Sorry, still think you're wasting your time..... The author "Inlinetext" believes that informing arbcom is a neccessary formality to be completed before he can approach WMF. S/he is well aware that Arbcom does not reply in 48 hours, so s/he had pinged "NYbrad" and will send an e...
- Tue Apr 04, 2017 6:54 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Email of a blocked user to ARBCOM (copied from another blog)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6481
Email of a blocked user to ARBCOM (copied from another blog)
Email of a blocked user to ARBCOM (Fair Use copied from another blog) To: The Arbitration Committee EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG <arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org> Date: 04 March 2017 Sirs, Subject : COMPLAINT of harassment, sockpuppetry, undisclosed paid edits etc. by Administrators and Oversighter(...