Tried--no response at all. You're welcome to take a shot.
Search found 4596 matches
- Tue Jun 10, 2025 6:26 am
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Was wondering what happened to Sarah Stierch
- Replies: 2
- Views: 211
Re: Was wondering what happened to Sarah Stierch
- Tue Jun 10, 2025 6:17 am
- Forum: Political
- Topic: Why Musk had Ken Klippenstein banned from Twitter/X
- Replies: 13
- Views: 13489
Re: Why Musk had Ken Klippenstein banned from Twitter/X
It was a shitshow--and Stonetoss had dropped out of the "news cycle". No mentions of him since the X-plosion of March '24. Now everyone knows his real name, and Musk looks like an idiot. As usual. And as usual....Klippenstein has also dropped out of the washing machine. The last post of his that was...
- Sun Jun 08, 2025 7:41 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Lawsuit: Wikipedia fired transgender worker who complained about harassment
- Replies: 37
- Views: 1295
Re: Lawsuit: Wikipedia fired transgender worker who complained about harassment
HTD. https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2025/06/trans-former-wikimedia-employee-says-at-the-nonprofit-is-organization-wide/ Still doesn't count as a major news outlet. They DO have a WP article..... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBTQ_Nation ...created in 2021 by someone who leans left but also makes me s...
- Sat Jun 07, 2025 2:10 am
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Articles Wikipedia should have--but doesn't.
- Replies: 231
- Views: 244152
Re: Articles Wikipedia should have--but doesn't.
If you type "David Geier" into WP's searchbox, you don't get an article on David Geier, you get the article about his late father Mark Geier. Both notorious anti-vax crusaders and promoters of questionable medical practices, both sanctioned by the state of Maryland for practicing medicine without a ...
Re: He gone
Let's not forget the AN discussion. A variety of well-known shitbirds showed up to twist and shout, usually in Bbb's favor. They all know damn well what a rotten bastard he's been for 13 years. Yet he still obtains "special treatment" as a "special person". https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title...
- Fri Jun 06, 2025 10:51 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Experiences with RationalWiki and MetaPedia?
- Replies: 41
- Views: 26943
Re: Experiences with RationalWiki and MetaPedia?
You make them sound so enthusiastic, but most of them seemed utterly listless and/or bored when I visited. I started asking questions and making statements and they did the usual song and dance but I got the impression they weren't really into it - not that they should be, but again I have to wonde...
- Thu Jun 05, 2025 9:11 pm
- Forum: Political
- Topic: USNS Harvey Milk
- Replies: 5
- Views: 225
Re: USNS Harvey Milk
Now THAT would be FUNNY.
It's a bit of a backhanded insult to name a lowly oiler ship after someone. It makes me wonder if some homophobic navy official had that idea--knowing that the gay folks would have no idea it was an insult.
- Wed Jun 04, 2025 6:39 am
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Crap or questionable articles
- Replies: 563
- Views: 472688
Re: Crap or questionable articles
Spot the difference (and then tell us why in the hell there are 2 repetitive articles basically about the same mountain)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimli_(mountain)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimli_Peak
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimli_(mountain)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimli_Peak
- Wed Jun 04, 2025 4:52 am
- Forum: Political
- Topic: USNS Harvey Milk
- Replies: 5
- Views: 225
USNS Harvey Milk
An editwar just starting. Over an article that has existed since 2016. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USNS_Harvey_Milk&action=history&offset=&limit=500 And an IP address that I expect to be eternab& shortly. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2600:1012:B35D:F52A:87F:4C70...
- Tue Jun 03, 2025 6:27 pm
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Crap or questionable articles
- Replies: 563
- Views: 472688
Re: Crap or questionable articles
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Power_Station Terrible article. I don't see evidence of any major updates in the past several years. And that giant table of MWh production in the middle of the article is totally worthless, unreadable, and unhelpful for a "general interest reference". It wastes...