Search found 83 matches
- Tue Mar 06, 2018 3:14 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: "Lawrence Cohen" RFA? He's Floquenbeam, Right?
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4116
Re: "Lawrence Cohen" RFA? He's Floquenbeam, Right?
Been meaning to post this. In case anyone read the above comment as suggesting Floquenbeam is actually a guy named Lawrence Cohen, no he's not. He's another one of these administrators that use real-sounding pseudonyms.
- Mon Mar 05, 2018 5:33 am
- Forum: Wikipediocracy talk
- Topic: John Carter
- Replies: 17
- Views: 11099
Re: John Carter
Yeah John Carter is a weasel and deserves to get banned from there. Whenever you look up drama he is in it! In fact he was one of the three idiots that decided to undo the community unban on me because they didn't want it. He was merrily chatting with you on your talkpage one day, and then on the n...
- Mon Mar 05, 2018 5:07 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Abd banned from the WMF projects
- Replies: 60
- Views: 53720
Re: Abd banned from the WMF projects
Kumioko wrote:
...it's interesting to me that the WMF is again using their office bans to target a critic of corruption, incompetence and abuse in their projects.
Yup. It could be "James Alexander" in the thick of it.
PS: That list is getting long.
- Sat Mar 03, 2018 5:01 am
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Drmies
- Replies: 324
- Views: 130874
Re: Drmies
This is not a warning, but I encourage our members to avoid anything other than identifying this person and examining this person's behavior.
EDIT: If personal addresses (or telephone numbers, etc.) are disclosed, I will talk to board management.
EDIT: If personal addresses (or telephone numbers, etc.) are disclosed, I will talk to board management.
- Mon Feb 12, 2018 2:17 pm
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Arbcom 2017: How Worthless and Horrible it Was
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3507
Re: Arbcom 2017: How Worthless and Horrible it Was
My ban came in 2012. i waited 8 months before writing back after they failed to reply to my messages. I think it was SilkTork who replied (after 8 months) 'oh we thought you would have given up by now'. To me that looked like a 'you're perpetually banned, don't bother us' message. I don't blanket i...
- Sun Feb 11, 2018 12:47 am
- Forum: Wikipediocracy talk
- Topic: Wikipediocracy is an Annoying Wikipedia Fanboard
- Replies: 103
- Views: 60038
Re: Wikipediocracy is an Annoying Wikipedia Fanboard
Yes, I want to conceal my IP from WO, and more so the freaks at WP. It's not that I feel physically threatened, but rather a privacy thing, meaning that WP administrative sector contacts employers talking trash (for example AGK (Andrew G. Kelly) vs. Kumioko) and then the utterly infamous case of Net...
- Wed Feb 07, 2018 6:34 pm
- Forum: Wikipediocracy talk
- Topic: Wikipediocracy is an Annoying Wikipedia Fanboard
- Replies: 103
- Views: 60038
Wikipediocracy is an Annoying Wikipedia Fanboard
Wikipediocracy is an annoying Wikipedia fanboard. The management there is actually blocking Tor IPs, not just from logging in, but from merely accessing the site. I brought this up some time ago, and was informed there might be another explanation for what I was seeing, but I really think that's wha...
- Wed Feb 07, 2018 6:19 pm
- Forum: Kumioko's Korner
- Topic: Kumioko, the Saga Begins Backwards
- Replies: 24
- Views: 40443
Re: Kumioko, the Saga Begins Backwards
Looking at the logs for User:Kumioko, his original account was renamed to User:Kumioko (renamed) whose first contributions were in 2007. He had some trouble with his sig later in the year, so it's plausible those could be his first contributions as a newb. They look like they could be the edits of ...
- Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:48 am
- Forum: Kumioko's Korner
- Topic: Kumioko, the Saga Begins Backwards
- Replies: 24
- Views: 40443
Kumioko, the Saga Begins Backwards
If you look up the account of Kumioko at Wikipedia right now, you are redirected to the "Reguyla" account, which began editing on 2 Jan. 2014. Is the Reguyla account then a sockpuppet of a perma-blocked Kumioko? It appears from its edits that yes it may have been at first, but a month or f...
- Thu Feb 01, 2018 10:24 am
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Arbcom 2017: How Worthless and Horrible it Was
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3507
Arbcom 2017: How Worthless and Horrible it Was
THE GOOD (there isn't that much of it) *Desysoped Arthur Rubin. Rubin apparently was a jerk to The Rambling Man, was forbidden by the WP:AN/ANI mob from editing pages other than his own talkpage (gee, how's that work, is it an honor system block)? But his chief offense to Arbcom was removing the New...