Search found 282 matches
- Wed Dec 11, 2019 4:34 pm
- Forum: Wikipediocracy talk
- Topic: 'Paddo Vigilant' wrote something - again
- Replies: 362
- Views: 116980
Re: So how about changing the illiterate, inflammatory title
Don't take it seriously. Vig hates you deeply, thus he will say any lies about you, just like about any of his victims. In the last 2 months, he contributed nothing of value besides the occasional pointless jokes. His comments are as good as laughing matter, which is the reason I copied it here. It...
- Tue Dec 03, 2019 4:48 am
- Forum: Wikipedia In The Media
- Topic: Remember Virgil Griffith?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2728
Re: Remember Virgil Griffith?
Those zany libertarians, helping out that friendly libertarian regime in North Korea.
MONEY > principles
RfB
MONEY > principles
RfB
- Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:02 am
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: Eric Corbett's, indeffed and banned
- Replies: 10
- Views: 5961
Re: Eric Corbett's, indeffed and banned
He had one another sock blocked since then. Got to voting in RfA In the last year he was not as productive, actually. His image of a great editor is the past now. That's only because he had a couple people hounding and harassing him constantly and the arbcom was totally fine with looking the other ...
- Wed Nov 13, 2019 3:48 am
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: EvergreenFir at RfA
- Replies: 15
- Views: 8824
Re: EvergreenFir at RfA
boredbird wrote:Carrite wrote:And that my own personal recollection from several years ago is incorrect?
Did you meet EvergreenFir in person?
No, did you?
RfB
- Wed Nov 13, 2019 2:11 am
- Forum: Wikipedians
- Topic: EvergreenFir at RfA
- Replies: 15
- Views: 8824
Re: EvergreenFir at RfA
It says everything about how the Wikipedia community is in the total grip of assholes and women haters, that a women candidate for Administrator, in 2019, when we are meant to believe Wikipedia is growing and changing, still has to profusely apologize for a five year old dispute with the notoriousl...
- Wed Nov 13, 2019 2:08 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: ArbCom elections 2019
- Replies: 61
- Views: 32359
Re: ArbCom elections 2019
...explaining how Beeblehrox isn't just flat out lying here in this answer...... I'm always careful not to say anything [on Wikipediocracy] that would violate the access to nonpublic information policy (despite being asked/pressured to do so on many occasions). ....given his actual posting record o...
- Wed Nov 13, 2019 12:49 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: ArbCom elections 2019
- Replies: 61
- Views: 32359
Re: ArbCom elections 2019
There is only one woman standing. And she is standing for re-election. So whatever else happens, one thing that is definitely taking a nose-dive this year, is Wikipedia's ability to say they care about gender equality. No, actually one thing is definitely taking a nose-dive this year is the percent...
- Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:44 pm
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Don't have a Bat-Cow, man
- Replies: 54
- Views: 32343
- Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:23 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: ArbCom elections 2019
- Replies: 61
- Views: 32359
Re: ArbCom elections 2019
The 2019 Arbcom election is up to 22 candidates (19 Arbs), not counting the one Arb who stood down when it became clear that there were more than 11 solid candidates.
Just a friendly reminder that 19 > 12.
RfB
Just a friendly reminder that 19 > 12.
RfB
- Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:15 pm
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Don't have a Bat-Cow, man
- Replies: 54
- Views: 32343
Re: Don't have a Bat-Cow, man
That's how it works. That's the guideline that applies... You're the one that sought documentation that what I did by stopping a unilateral de facto deletion of sourced content was kosher. It was kosher. Whatever. Even in this short comment, you're being a self-serving skeevy little fuck. Redirecti...