It's amazing his followers even liked him considering so much of his Twitter activity was pump and dumping cryptos, and selling on his followers specifically

[[Brian Gilmartin]] was an article for at least 8 years on Wikipedia, albeit poorly written. There's more than enough to include him just based on non-academic mainstream articles and widely published books. But they just pretended all that mattered were academic notability guidelines. Looking at De...

edit; accidental double post

[[Male lesbianism]] (controversial postmodern identity) [[Sexual economics theory]] (not "sexual economics") [[Cicisbeism]] (academic mating concept, not "cicisbeo") [[Wife exchange]] (not swinging, eg native american wife exchange) [[Involuntary sexual abstinence]] [[Brian Gilmartin]] (author) [[De...

Holocaust-denial related squabbles are one of those deeply disturbing areas that Wikipedia is very poorly set up to handle. "The encyclopedia anyone can edit" really should NOT allow people with extremist political agendas to edit. But they do. I think once you venture into Wikipedia articles with ...

I think every Mediawiki project has more or less the same trajectory It start off with a flurry of excitement that lasts a few years. There's tons of open space to write whatever. Everyone feels important, everyone feels smart, everyone feels special for getting in early. At some point, as mentioned...

Wikipedia just rejected letting in what seemed to be an aggressive Section 230 reform push article by Megan Twohey and another respected NYTimes journalist. https://archive.ph/hNnwG#Incel You can see there. They rejected it on being month old news, and yet stuff their incel article with news the wee...