Does math work differently on that other site? Because I could have sworn 15<19.I think the guts of the ballot this year is 15 to pick 11.
Search found 3907 matches
- Wed Nov 13, 2019 12:09 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: ArbCom elections 2019
- Replies: 61
- Views: 32369
Re: ArbCom elections 2019
Hey Timmy, who is this guy over at the central.......?
- Wed Nov 13, 2019 12:03 am
- Forum: Wikipedia In The Media
- Topic: Socked Into the Puppet-Hole on Wikipedia
- Replies: 15
- Views: 10290
Re: Socked Into the Puppet-Hole on Wikipedia
and occasionally finding links to authoritative sources of information. Only for the lazy or stupid, neither of whom should probably be doing anything that requires looking for sources of authoritative information. The fact is, people do see Wikipedia as an encyclopedia precisely because they are u...
- Tue Nov 12, 2019 7:57 pm
- Forum: Wikipediocracy talk
- Topic: Wikipediocracy is Down and Up after unanticipated update
- Replies: 21
- Views: 13873
Re: Wikipediocracy site broken
Not that this place can lay claim to the title either anymore.The Wikipedia Critics' Forum
- Tue Nov 12, 2019 7:12 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: ArbCom elections 2019
- Replies: 61
- Views: 32369
Re: ArbCom elections 2019
On Timmy! You are so ridiculous. The real count now, at a nominal 22 candidates, for non-insane people looking for a democratic means to express their will, the choice is now anywhere between ten and thirteen viable candidates (given the entirely predictable late trend for last minute semi-reluctant...
- Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:38 pm
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Don't have a Bat-Cow, man
- Replies: 54
- Views: 32360
Re: Don't have a Bat-Cow, man
The two outcomes are functionally equal, as anyone with a modicum of honesty and intelligence can recognize at a glance. Irredeemable. You literally explained in the post that you buried this nonsense in, why they are not functionally equivalent. One leaves the content recoverable by even a novice ...
- Tue Nov 12, 2019 6:09 pm
- Forum: Wikipedia In The Media
- Topic: Socked Into the Puppet-Hole on Wikipedia
- Replies: 15
- Views: 10290
Re: Socked Into the Puppet-Hole on Wikipedia
A great article, in the sense that while Kumioko won't admit it, it paints all sides as absolutely fucking mental, total losers with way too much time on their hands and not enough mountain lions in their backyard, and reminds readers that Wikipedia is an absolute joke, something that doesn't deserv...
- Tue Nov 12, 2019 5:52 pm
- Forum: Content Issues
- Topic: Don't have a Bat-Cow, man
- Replies: 54
- Views: 32360
Re: Don't have a Bat-Cow, man
That's how it works. That's the guideline that applies... You're the one that sought documentation that what I did by stopping a unilateral de facto deletion of sourced content was kosher. It was kosher. Whatever. Even in this short comment, you're being a self-serving skeevy little fuck. Redirecti...
- Mon Nov 11, 2019 2:52 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: ArbCom elections 2019
- Replies: 61
- Views: 32369
Re: ArbCom elections 2019
KrakatoaKatie and Isarra are in today, running the total to 12 administrators in the race, by my count. You're wrong again, Crow. You lose. Good thing you never put your small wallet where your big mouth is. That's very prudent of you, you flubsy fundused fluffy bunny... RfB P.S. Nope, Isarra isn't...
- Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:59 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Suggestion: Our own Wiki.
- Replies: 17
- Views: 8707
Re: Suggestion: Our own Wiki.
Honestly that's part of the problem. Zoloft is so busy towing the party line and handing out the Koolaid he can't really be a critic. No different to the way you like to pretend Wikipedia can be fixed, if only blah blah blah. You're both hopeless believers in a reform that will never come, because ...
- Mon Nov 11, 2019 1:55 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Questioning Wikipedia's innovation-killing evasion policy.
- Replies: 13
- Views: 7485
Re: Questioning Wikipedia's innovation-killing evasion polic
You are of course missing an important detail. Wikipedia is manifestly not for readers, it is for editors. That is the root of the approach that says it doesn't matter what someone does as an editor, only what their status is, i.e., are they allowed to do it. The concept of banishment, of demarcatio...