Kraken banned by Zoloft

[Kraken]

she found a way to make the community think her request that they use the block tool as a mechanism for punishment was actually a decision they arrived at all by themselves and not as a result of her evil woke witchcraft

lol
She's too crazy to be "woke", it would imply she had a coherent political opinion set. And apart from the crypto rants, I have yet to see real evidence of coherency.

She's always seemed pretty coherently feminist to me? Ditto for "skewing toward socialism". Her views on crypto make absolute sense in this regard. She sees the block chain as a potential means to enslave women, and sees cryotocurrency as an establishment plot.

I think she and Zoloft would get on like a house on fire. Right down to having a good old laugh about how everyone on Wikipediocracy is buying into the myth that I'm an incel/fascist, the NewSpeak explanation for my ban from the forum that he's allowed to be spread around unchecked. Because the truth would see him lynched as a traitor to the cause. I'm a feminist and my politics are mainstream for the UK. Anyone trying to prove otherwise with actual facts, evidence, will really struggle. These claims are the fever dreams of people I have skewered with my work. Their jealousy and embarrassment has reached epic proportions.

I am a better Wikipedia critic than any of the people Comrade Zoloft deems worthy. Including him. My criticism of Wikipedia's deployment of the NPOV when it comes to woke triggers like transphobia, and my exposure of the fact Molly's role in the block of Chris Troutman only makes sense as a policy backed reaction to sexism if you have had a lobotomy (or are too scared to challenge Zoloft when he's using his power to state black is white and up is down), are a threat to him. They are a threat to Molly.

I am banned because of it. Like a ninja, I slipped in silently, quietly, not rocking the boat. I never asked to be let back in, much less begged. I just turned up and started posting. My usual high quality work. I helped them realise Wikipedia is vastly under-estimating the number of active Administrators.

I did this to prove that they have nothing against me as a person or a critic. That they do not see my presence as unwelcome, if I'm being a good boy. Not rising to the bait. The extreme harassment. It was fun. Watching Vigilant lose his damn mind as it dawned on him what it means to be poweful, but not in charge.

I was banned only when I focused on what Zoloft deems to be heresy. Politics. The really rather obvious political motives of high profile Wikipedia editors, and their rank abuse of NPOV. The sort of people who he has for years been trying to persuade that Wikipediocracy can be a partner, not a threat. That Vigilant will never doxx them. He will doxx only the Enemies of the Wikipedia-Wikipediocracy leftist alliance. Did anyone ever see Vigilant doxx a left-wing nutjob? Me neither. He is a left wing nutjob! The embodiment of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Everyone in the UK who thinks J.K. Rowling has a point and the activists who would see her locked up are the real threat to public order, is a "bigot", according to that fuckstick.

People like Vigilant and Elinruby have to be literally led by the nose like the unruly children they are, to the uncomfortable facts that show they're slightly to the left of delusional. The woke hard left agenda, the theory that says It's totally fine to place literal rapists (legal definition: penetration with a penis) in a women's prison because they put on a wig one day, is the literal reason Scotland's entire political system is now in chaos. Had been for a few years, in truth.

The woke hard left has melted an entire nation. One of the four nations of the United Kingdom. The nation that was actually the most progressive in its evident politics and actual laws in the UK. The one nation enacting the kind of genuinely socialist/green policies that make you unelectable in England. The kind of stuff that would see you labelled as a literal Communist in the U.S. even by the Democrats. Bernie stuff.

That's the far left for you. If you don't give them everything they demand, you're an identarian bigot and so you will be destroyed. Even if you are their most logical political ally and the only realistic partner if they ever want to achieve their political aims. Which they dont. Because the far left is only about virtue signalling and martyrdom, not effecting real change. Tiny websites imagining they have real power, real threat. And some do. But Vigilant is too much of a coward to join their ranks. His weapon is a Facebook profile pic. Tragic.

It's almost too funny for words that it's Anroth doing the draggjng. The guy who sees me as a lunatic unworthy of even acknowledging. With the full consent of Zoloft.

Zoloft isn't offended by Katherine Maher's politics. He's absolutely fine with the fact the privelaged white woman who led Wikipedia and now leads NPR, holds political views so extreme she's the one who would be more likely to be arrested by the Scottish Police for using Twatter to not merely have a robust debate about controversial views but to incite hatred and instil fear in the evil white men who run the world. If we imagined for a second that hate crime laws are there to protect everyone, including white men with no power or privelage.

Zoloft is only mad that she expresses her views in a way that prompts only laughter, not impact.

After two months during which the only evident issue the management had with me officially was post length and the fact Vigilant might flood the already struggling server room with his delicious tears (to use a favourite phrase or his), no sooner had I shifted my approach to target the sacred cows of Wikipediocracy and barbecued them, I was banned. I can't even say it was on purpose on my part. An evil plan. Politics isn't by an stretch the main reason for my interest in Wikipedia criticism.

But I won't shy away from it just because I'm scared someone will stop me posting on a website. I'm not Vigilant. As everyone seems to understand, should the day come when I can't access any Wikipedia criticism platform, I could create my own, and it would quickly become a must visit destination by those currently interested in Wikipedia criticism and those who have been turned off of it because of the likes of Vigilant.

I bring eyeballs. People want to read my stuff. Because I know my stuff. I've put the time in. Done the work. Seen the things.

It is known.

And it is also denied by the people it scares. Who don't like the fact I exist. Want to cancel me. This is the new dawn of Wikipedia criticism as far as Wikipediocracy is concerned. It is activist editors in lock step with the activists elements of Wikipediocracy to control what is and is not valid criticism of Wikipedia, using all the time honoured tactics of the far left.

Fear and gaslighting. Keeping tight control of a very small pond.

By the time the non-batshit non-fringe editors and members realise it, there will be nothing they can do. Having their faces ripped off by Vigilant and being subjected to Kafkaesque blocks on Wikipedia, will be seen as normal. Acceptable. It is they who will be the crazy ones. Afraid to speak their mind.

Afraid to challenge the privileged straight white men and women who are typically found at the very top of the far left. The current UK Prime Minister is a British-Asian son of immigrants, but I'm quite sure these particular powerful white people will be happy to explain his right wing (often described as fascist by the Twatterati) views as the product of Empire, slavery and patriarchy. But not in a way that casts him as a victim, of course. Or a hero.

Because as useful as their outrage and face ripping harassment is, as the head of a powerful far left entity, you'd never actually give any actual power to an Elinruby or a LilianaUwU, would you? That would be crazy.

Hilarious that they don't see it, these tools. These Heroes Of Woke.

Is Molly White a bad fit for Wikimedia CEO because she's outspoken or because she's a queer with the pronouns she/her? Or because she's pretty, but not quite blonde enough? You're not sure are you. You think you know the answer, but you're not sure. Can't be sure without claiming into the minds of the Board Members who make such appointments. Know what drives them. Test their purity without the filter of their mouth and conscious thoughts getting in the way of you and their truth.

That's reality fucking with you.

The knowledge there's something not quite right with this world.

You just can't put your finger on It.

It's the Matrix.

It has already happened.

And I'm laughing

Because I chose the moniker Neo for assorted gaming/chat platforms long before I had ever even heard of Wikipedia. Because it didn't even exist.

But someone just had to create it, didn't they. Or so goes the theory.

Inevitable.



This has been a message of the resistance.

[boredbird]

She's always seemed pretty coherently feminist to me? Ditto for "skewing toward socialism".

I've seen no evidence that she cares about the working class just herself. If feminism didn't mean "promote me and "give me money!" she wouldn't support it. Opportunistic self-promotion explains all her behavior including crypto. Her politics are whatever they need to be; there is nothing interesting about them by design.

She sees the block chain as a potential means to enslave women, and sees cryotocurrency as an establishment plot.

Lolwut? Like incels blockchaining her to a radiatior in the basement? Okay what's her onlyfans site called again?

[Fyfe]

I am banned because of it. Like a ninja, I slipped in silently, quietly, not rocking the boat. I never asked to be let back in, much less begged. I just turned up and started posting. My usual high quality work. I helped them realise Wikipedia is vastly under-estimating the number of active Administrators.

I did this to prove that they have nothing against me as a person or a critic. That they do not see my presence as unwelcome, if I'm being a good boy. Not rising to the bait. The extreme harassment. It was fun. Watching Vigilant lose his damn mind as it dawned on him what it means to be poweful, but not in charge.

I see what you're saying here.

I can only assume it gets exhausting for you.

While I see what your goal is, I don't think that's the goal you need. I'm happy to discuss this further with you. I'm inviting you to get in touch. Check your messages. The sooner, the better.

[Kraken]

I can only assume it gets exhausting for you.

I've never felt more alive. I needed that reminder.

Every now and again you need close personal contact with those who would drive a stake through your heart, if only they had the brains, the brawn, and the skill with a stake, to achieve their goal, to be reminded of what makes you a very special boy.

One of the best at what they do, and certainly the one with the longest and deepest commitment to achieving ultimate victory in this endeavour.

My life is far too comfortable without this calling.

Which isn't religious. I do what I do for the Realms of Men. The Gods can do as they please, especially since in my world, with my people, who were previously a right bunch of Crusading bastards, God is gradually being deprecated.

Your private message made no sense to me otherwise.

Are you sure you know who I am and what I do? More importantly, why I do it.

My critics have no clue. Hence their fondness for caricature or just plain fantasy.

[boredbird]

Like a ninja, I slipped in silently, quietly, not rocking the boat.

Don't kid yourself. Tarantino spotted you right away but decided to let you post again. Same as we do.
I'm sure you could sound like someone else if you tried, but that would make it work, not fun.; you enjoy your trademark diatribes too much to forswear them.

[Fyfe]

I can only assume it gets exhausting for you.

I've never felt more alive. I needed that reminder.

I hear you saying that you feel great. Not everything that feels good is good.

IEvery now and again you need close personal contact with those who would drive a stake through your heart, if only they had the brains, the brawn, and the skill with a stake, to achieve their goal, to be reminded of what makes you a very special boy.

Are you quite sure that those who would kill you are not succeeding?

One of the best at what they do, and certainly the one with the longest and deepest commitment to achieving ultimate victory in this endeavour.

[Pro 16:18 Pride [goeth] before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall. 19 Better [it is to be] of an humble spirit with the lowly, than to divide the spoil with the proud.

Is this really what you need to be victorious?

My life is far too comfortable without this calling.

You're saying the highest calling in your life is being the best Wikipedia critic?

Which isn't religious. I do what I do for the Realms of Men. The [entities] can do as they please, especially since in my world, with my people, who were previously a right bunch of Crusading bastards, God is gradually being deprecated.

Are you happy that Great Britain is deprecating God? How do you feel about the Church of England?

Your private message made no sense to me otherwise.

I'm asking what you're reading in the Bible.

Are you sure you know who I am and what I do? More importantly, why I do it.

I think you think you know why you do it

My critics have no clue. Hence their fondness for caricature or just plain fantasy.

Say that back to yourself slowly.

[Kraken]

I can only assume it gets exhausting for you.

I've never felt more alive. I needed that reminder.

I hear you saying that you feel great. Not everything that feels good is good.

Sure. What's your point? it feels good to me because it's the right thing to do. If Zoloft and Company are confused by it, all I can say is if woke means anything, it's that making myself feel good is the most important thing in the world, right?

IEvery now and again you need close personal contact with those who would drive a stake through your heart, if only they had the brains, the brawn, and the skill with a stake, to achieve their goal, to be reminded of what makes you a very special boy.

Are you quite sure that those who would kill you are not succeeding?

Quite sure. What gives you any reason to think otherwise?

One of the best at what they do, and certainly the one with the longest and deepest commitment to achieving ultimate victory in this endeavour.

[Pro 16:18 Pride [goeth] before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall. 19 Better [it is to be] of an humble spirit with the lowly, than to divide the spoil with the proud.

Is this really what you need to be victorious?

It's self evident, is it not? You can either be a Tom Brady or a Kirk Cousins.

My life is far too comfortable without this calling.

You're saying the highest calling in your life is being the best Wikipedia critic?

Well, yes. Wikipedia is the biggest con-trick in the history of the modern world. High Priests of Woke are literally walking the Earth spouting transparently false propaganda, "the content on Wikipedia tends to be very high quality", and because America prefers to shoot its schoolchildren rather than educate them, this is actually working.

In just ten years, Wikipedia has gone from a dinner party quirk to a super rich "Foundation" with a clear eyed intent on being in every school, home and social justice rally. They want their giant stinking garbage pile to be "ubiquitous" (read:unavoidable) and they want access to Wikipedia to be seen as a universal human right and are lobbying the United Nations to that effect. Even though it is proven Californian legal precedent that on Wikipedia you have no rights.

There are people on Wikipediocracy who call me a lunatic. Me. A man so skilled at peeling back the bullshit of Wikipedia and its filthy horde of defenders, he can sum up what this all means in one sentence. Why would Wikipedia be due the trappings of universal human rights when it accepts none of the associated responsibilities? When it actually has all the trappings of a dictatorship. Secret trials. Sham elections. Roving Judge Dredds, enforcing rules they interpret on the spot. And that's just the volunteers!

People genuinely ignorant of these things can be forgiven. So called Wikipedia critics and people who run so called Wikipedia criticism sites who are aware of it and are not just doing nothing but working against me, are franky worse than pedophiles, incels and fascists. All insults levelled at me by the agents of woke because I won't shut up about their precious encyclopedia and the scum who are behind it all. What's driving them, when you get right down to it. Control.

I could give a shit about Trump or the rise of fascism. I'm a stone cold killer, a former professional soldier, so if I find myself in a world without a King or a vote, so be it. It's every man for himself. What I absolutely will not stand for, is a world where Wikipedia is knowledge and therefore all significant choices made by citizens and their governments are informed by the warped fucks behind it. I will fight to protect the future of my family. I will fight for those who cannot fight. I am a soldier in the true tradition of the British Army - my weapon is my mind. My cunning. My craft. Fuck the green berets, who frankly need a million dollars and an F-16 just find their bumhole after going number two in the woods.

Which isn't religious. I do what I do for the Realms of Men. The [entities] can do as they please, especially since in my world, with my people, who were previously a right bunch of Crusading bastards, God is gradually being deprecated.

Are you happy that Great Britain is deprecating God? How do you feel about the Church of England?

I'm an atheist, so yes. Compared to other world religions, the CofE has done alright. But its had its day. Served its purpose. As the American right continues to cling to God like he's wrapped in bacon, dipped in sugar and toting an AR-15, and the American left replace their Gods with false "Justice" idols in the image of woke and any other repressive movement going, the Brits are embracing the truth.

We stand alone. You are a human. You derive your strength and your values from within, as an educated and outward looking people. True globalists, humanists, democrats. A people who reject the narrow confines of the institutions of the past. A peaceful people who are unafraid to use force as a last resort. Not waiting to see if the fascists retraat of their own accord, like our American cousins. People who know what a fascist looks like and how to deal with one. People who, the loony left excepted, would never misuse such powerful terms for short term political ends. The only good Nazi is a dead Nazi.

The products of the left, such as the increasingly isolationist and chronically weak EU, are now disavowed, by popular vote. Popular not populist. So weak and compromised it cannot even protect its own neighbour or get beyond a time when violent disorder was political discourse. Like their American friends. Such is the truth of the continental religion, which has forever been a cult of gold and gaslights, and why we had to tell the Great White Priest to go do one all those centuries ago.

Your private message made no sense to me otherwise.

I'm asking what you're reading in the Bible.

which is what confused me.....

Are you sure you know who I am and what I do? More importantly, why I do it.

I think you think you know why you do it

Obviously. I'm not a madman.

My critics have no clue. Hence their fondness for caricature or just plain fantasy.

Say that back to yourself slowly.

Done. Now what? I think you missed a key distinction there. The difference between a fantastical view of others and a representation of one's self.

-----

I'm not entirely sure what your purpose is here. But if you are in any way affiliated with Zoloft, thank you for the opportunity to explain the effect of his ban.

He is an enemy of everything that is right and just. Let him deny it.

He cannot deny his truth. He will not deny it.

He only knows how to lie, and then delete the lies. He is a true High Priest of Woke. To the left of Maher indeed.

How apt that as I write this, the radio is informating me that the far left Muslim-British First Minister of Scotland is about to resign. His dream of freeeeedom for his people dashed because he vastly under-estimated the support in Scotland for a far left agenda, a woke aganda. His party now riven with division, having utterly wasted the clearly quite progressive ballot box wishes of the Scots with respect to the English, and taken more than he was given. A far left trait. And in the process, spent more than he could raise, to the tune of a billion pounds. Another trait of the far left. Didn't learn the lessons of a narrowly lost popular vote that rejected independence now, but not forever. Peak far left.

Twitter did that. And X did that. Twitter made him think woke was the future. X set him straight. J.K. Rowling set him straight.

Eat it, Elinruby, you utter ignoramus. Thank you Anroth, I appreciate how embarrassing it must be for you to find yourself having to admit this deranged lunatic had a point and things were getting so ridiculous on Pravdaocracy you had to speak up for the real world. The world of facts, not woke bullshit. I guess this will be yet another aspect of reality you will find it convenient to later forget, when I return to reap more souls. Some might say this was a sign of mental illness on your part. I disagree. I just think you're a cunt (UK definition).

British Justice set the First Minister straight. Cheats never proper. Corruption will always be rooted out. Democracy is not dictatorship. Wikipedia is a lie. Easily manipulated by people with an agenda.

Are you listening, Zoloft? Do you see your future?

The power of real feminists and British free speech. Not your bastardised American versions of said concepts. Our values of fair play and reasonableness, not your American world of opinions nuttier than squirrel shit being graduably, forcibly, normalised. Your mobs on the streets and your mobs on Wikipedia. Your own little mob of shitheels.

The myth that the youth will sweep away the established order and free Scotland is laid bare once more. The people campaigning for independence in the 2014 referendum are now approaching or are smack back within middle age. They're the ones on the radio scratching their heads, unable to figure out how or why their own First Minister, their political leader, lost his damn mind. He got a brain disease. He got woke.

He got a bad case of the Mollies.

Hopefully you live to see the day when you're called to account for your actions.

Your use of your powers to alter what was said in your thread about Molly's block of Chris Troutman. Your view of what is and is not "on-topic". What is and is not "toxic".

We don't do lynchings in the UK. The First Minister isn't resigning because he fears he's about to be strung up from a lamppost. Nobody is making the case he is a victim of racism. It's ludicrous. The facts too stark. His failures too obvious. And even if it was, the beneficiary is going to be a minority of some sort, such is the progressive nature of Scotland. The leader of the Labour party is a Muslim male. The Greens are co-led by a bisexual white male and an autistic white woman. The King Maker/Slayer is a white woman.

It was a shock to me to see the centrist party up there is now led by a white straight man. But he is also a well educated man who decided politics was a career in of itself. And in contrast to Scotland, thanks to woke, the English are heartily sick of being told they're wrong by politicians of minority parties who haven't done an honest day's work in their lives, whether that be white or blue collar work. But we express our displeasure at the ballot box, waiting our turn, waiting until the Monarch of this United Kingdom consents, not the end of a bow and arrow, like it's 1066 all over again.

Lynchings and white terror in front line politics are the stuff of your world. Your country. The country that gave us Wikipedia.

Your idea of what is and is not on topic or toxic.

Seize him Timmy!

[boredbird]

A man so skilled at peeling back the bullshit of Wikipedia and its filthy horde of defenders, he can sum up what this all means in one sentence.

That would be appreciated.

[Fyfe]

Every now and again you need close personal contact with those who would drive a stake through your heart, if only they had the brains, the brawn, and the skill with a stake, to achieve their goal, to be reminded of what makes you a very special boy.

Are you quite sure that those who would kill you are not succeeding?

Quite sure. What gives you any reason to think otherwise?

Reading the Bible.

Which isn't religious. I do what I do for the Realms of Men. The [entities] can do as they please, especially since in my world, with my people, who were previously a right bunch of Crusading bastards, God is gradually being deprecated.

Are you happy that Great Britain is deprecating God? How do you feel about the Church of England?

I'm an atheist, so yes.

If you were to discover that the supernatural were real, would you then choose to worship and serve God Most High or evil? The pedophiles and liars are on the side of evil.

Rather than reply to my post, as your life moves forward consider what I wrote.

[Kraken]

Huh.

Theres is no God. Once you make peace with that, you'll move forward in your life.

The reality of America's relationship with belief even far from the red state hotbeds of the truly unhinged, is seen in the story of the former Seattle based Catholic nun whose life was ruined by abuse at age 7. Clearly sexually and power motivated. Having disavowed structured religion, I'm perplexed how she can still believe in her 80s that there is a supernatural force out there looking out for her. She's got her new God and her old one. One rooted in Seattle. She thinks being a bisexual abuse victim will help her unseal the confession and stop child abuse by the church. Bonkers. Makes absolutely no sense.

But I don't need God to explain it. Only science. My UK schooling.

My fascist incel nutbag ways, as the shitheels of Wikipediocracy put it.

Makes you wonder what they're smoking. And we sure as shit know their stance on whether or not it should be legal to read a man's mind, should the technology arrive.

Your God can't save you from these mad bastards.