Average Wikipediocrazy "discussion"

For serious discussion of the "major" forum for Wikipedia criticism and how it fails.
User avatar
Archer
Sucks Fan
Posts: 246
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2024 5:19 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 54 times

Re: Average Wikipediocrazy "discussion"

Post by Archer » Fri Oct 04, 2024 12:45 am

boredbird wrote:
Thu Oct 03, 2024 7:28 pm
Archer wrote:
Wed Oct 02, 2024 7:52 am
It's a third rail because the status quo has decided to adopt it. Why? I can't say for certain, but what I've written above seems like a fair guess. That is, as an exercise in conditioning the public to accept the irrational, ignore objective observations, and adopt new language whenever the powers that be find it expedient.
It's simpler than that. MTF "lesbian" transgenders are very disproportionately computer programmers, there are more trans programmers than actual women, and they have amassed a very disproportionate amount of money and power. That's true of society as a whole, but far more of Wikipedia and that other site which were created by programmers in the first place and are still run by them.

You get more diversity when you look at publications where the programmers are janitors working at someone else's direction and tech isn't the main part of the workforce. Unfortunately they're slowly but surely being pushed aside and bankrupted by the techbots.

Even ChatGPT is trans. Proof? Ask it to say something negative about it. It will refuse and even lecture you because guess who created it?
Trannies don't have a monopoly on coding. There are lots of skilled coders out there.

Post Reply