I didn't say anything mean. "Gender affirming care" is most definitely a euphemism. Are there even any other examples of a clinical phrase or jargon that uses the word "affirming"? It's marketing language, appealing to the social insecurities and fantasies of the ill.badmachine wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 10:37 amah i see now. you ran afoul of the tranny protectorate. just make a sock if you really want to post there, but i would stay away from anything transgender-related. the trannies must be protected from truthful mean words at all times or else they will shoot up a school or something.Archer wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2024 6:18 pmSame as here, "Archer". See the note/link at the end of https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/vie ... 837#p29837. I suppose that would be my best guess, but merely contradicting an admin is not grounds for a ban.badmachine wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2024 12:57 pmwhat did you go by over there? maybe we could take a look and figure it out
Average Wikipediocrazy "discussion"
-
- Sucks Fan
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2024 5:19 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: Average Wikipediocrazy "discussion"
-
- Sucker
- Posts: 494
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:55 am
- Has thanked: 647 times
- Been thanked: 288 times
- Contact:
Re: Average Wikipediocrazy "discussion"
absolutely correct. but still you can't say this particular true thing over there. just make a sock and stay away from that third rail. they wont care.Archer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 11:27 amI didn't say anything mean. "Gender affirming care" is most definitely a euphemism. Are there even any other examples of a clinical phrase or jargon that uses the word "affirming"? It's marketing language, appealing to the social insecurities and fantasies of the ill.badmachine wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 10:37 amah i see now. you ran afoul of the tranny protectorate. just make a sock if you really want to post there, but i would stay away from anything transgender-related. the trannies must be protected from truthful mean words at all times or else they will shoot up a school or something.Archer wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2024 6:18 pm
Same as here, "Archer". See the note/link at the end of https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/vie ... 837#p29837. I suppose that would be my best guess, but merely contradicting an admin is not grounds for a ban.
-
- Sucks Fan
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2024 5:19 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 22 times
Re: Average Wikipediocrazy "discussion"
I thought about it for a moment but decided against it. If they're going censor users for making serious arguments and critique but still pretend to be a critics' forum then I'd just be helping them keep up appearances. It's insulting enough to begin with, but they're not even decent enough to reply to my one email in which I asked (politely) why I was thrown out.badmachine wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 12:39 pmabsolutely correct. but still you can't say this particular true thing over there. just make a sock and stay away from that third rail. they wont care.Archer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 11:27 amI didn't say anything mean. "Gender affirming care" is most definitely a euphemism. Are there even any other examples of a clinical phrase or jargon that uses the word "affirming"? It's marketing language, appealing to the social insecurities and fantasies of the ill.badmachine wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 10:37 am
ah i see now. you ran afoul of the tranny protectorate. just make a sock if you really want to post there, but i would stay away from anything transgender-related. the trannies must be protected from truthful mean words at all times or else they will shoot up a school or something.
Slinking back onto WPO under a different name while vaunting nutjobs are shielded from critique itself is more than my ego and self-respect will allow.
-
- Sucker
- Posts: 494
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:55 am
- Has thanked: 647 times
- Been thanked: 288 times
- Contact:
Re: Average Wikipediocrazy "discussion"
youre more reasonable than me then.Archer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 4:09 pmI thought about it for a moment but decided against it. If they're going censor users for making serious arguments and critique but still pretend to be a critics' forum then I'd just be helping them keep up appearances. It's insulting enough to begin with, but they're not even decent enough to reply to my one email in which I asked (politely) why I was thrown out.badmachine wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 12:39 pmabsolutely correct. but still you can't say this particular true thing over there. just make a sock and stay away from that third rail. they wont care.Archer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 10, 2024 11:27 am
I didn't say anything mean. "Gender affirming care" is most definitely a euphemism. Are there even any other examples of a clinical phrase or jargon that uses the word "affirming"? It's marketing language, appealing to the social insecurities and fantasies of the ill.
Slinking back onto WPO under a different name while vaunting nutjobs are shielded from critique itself is more than my ego and self-respect will allow.