Cla68

For serious discussion of the "major" forum for Wikipedia criticism and how it fails.
Post Reply
User avatar
CrowsNest
Sucks Maniac
Posts: 4459
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2018 4:50 am
Been thanked: 5 times

Cla68

Post by CrowsNest » Tue Mar 05, 2019 9:13 pm

Lolwut?
If Wikipedia's administrators had a clue, they would completely ignore this. When the MfD was completed, no admins should deign to respond. When someone posts angry requests on ANI/AN asking for an administrator to close the MfD, again, no administrator should even answer. When someone starts an RfAR, it should be met with deafening silence from the arbs and their clerks, and then with an archive of the case request a week later with an anodyne comment in the edit summary, like, "Archiving" and nothing more. At first it will drive Fae and his friends absolutely crazy that no one is responding to their histrionics, but then they'll fall quiet, and move on, watching with eager anticipation for the next outbreak of homophobic persecution.
Well, I guess these days we have to award him a Gold Star for Effort. Back in the day, you'd just smack him up side the head and say Shut Up You Crazy Fool, the grown ups be talkin' here.

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4624
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1158 times
Been thanked: 1848 times

Re: Cla68

Post by ericbarbour » Thu Mar 07, 2019 6:39 am

Ya see, this is why we can't have goodness in the world
I went looking for that quote and found this first....

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtop ... =8&t=10181

idiots

User avatar
Stierlitz
Sucks Admin
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2019 12:03 am
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Cla68

Post by Stierlitz » Thu Mar 07, 2019 9:04 pm

ericbarbour wrote:Ya see, this is why we can't have goodness in the world
I went looking for that quote and found this first....

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtop ... =8&t=10181

idiots


Tarantino is a bag of flaming dogshit for naming names when there was no fucking point for doing so. He is the dick's dick, which is why I thought he was a skip-tracer or an IT guy for a detective agency because he felt like he was finally able to use his skills to humiliate people, but only online people inside the world's most rambleshack online encyclopedia.
A sockpuppet of Strelnikov, without NOW with the Admin powers of Strelnikov.

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4624
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1158 times
Been thanked: 1848 times

Re: Cla68

Post by ericbarbour » Fri Mar 08, 2019 1:55 am

Anyway, back to CLA......as I've said before, he is the kind of editor they SHOULD BE trying to keep. Instead they like to fight with him and block him, for expressing his honest opinions and thus "being not of the body" and so forth.

His userpage says one thing, his block log says something totally different. And uglier. This is Wikipedia at its worst.

BTW while trying to figure out why GorillaWarfare put an "Arbcom approved oversight block blah blah" on him in 2016 (since I was out of WO by then, I didn't follow that little mess) I found this valuable piece of information lol:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... 2-17/Op-ed

Here's the Wo thread for those with a strong stomach. Cla was fighting with MastCell and the inevitable happened
http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtop ... =38&t=7494

Post Reply