Page 36 of 37

Re: 'Paddo Vigilant' wrote something - again

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 12:00 am
by JuiceBeetle
http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtop ... 09#p256726
Vigilant wrote:Abusive Banal Denunciation's ongoing war with the Castellan du Folie have a escalated to the point that the Valarauko who runs the asylum has finally, groggily struggled to his feet and announced the beginning of the Great Hunt.

Mumbles of "Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius," were heard from many of the fainter wraiths trapped in that damned barrow.

Image The birth of a poet.

Re: 'Paddo Vigilant' wrote something - again

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 12:27 am
by Abd
JuiceBeetle wrote:http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=10909#p256726
Vigilant wrote:Abusive Banal Denunciation's ongoing war with the Castellan du Folie have a escalated to the point that the Valarauko who runs the asylum has finally, groggily struggled to his feet and announced the beginning of the Great Hunt.

Vigilant is obviously following Sucks closely. That was fast.

And they repeat the story that I caused a forum to fail. That would be Offwiki. And I did not cause that to fail, failure was entirely the doing of the Flounder, Wil Sinclair, helped along by some experienced trolls. How that happened is typical of fake news. A shred of truth is twisted and distorted far beyond any reasonable implications, into a summary that fits expectations, which then becomes the oft-repeated story.

Re: 'Paddo Vigilant' wrote something - again

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 12:49 am
by JuiceBeetle
Abd wrote:And they repeat the story that I caused a forum to fail.

Don't take it seriously. Vig hates you deeply, thus he will say any lies about you, just like about any of his victims. In the last 2 months, he contributed nothing of value besides the occasional pointless jokes. His comments are as good as laughing matter, which is the reason I copied it here.

Re: 'Paddo Vigilant' wrote something - again

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 2:50 am
by Abd
JuiceBeetle wrote:
Abd wrote:And they repeat the story that I caused a forum to fail.

Don't take it seriously. Vig hates you deeply, thus he will say any lies about you, just like about any of his victims. In the last 2 months, he contributed nothing of value besides the occasional pointless jokes. His comments are as good as laughing matter, which is the reason I copied it here.

It wasn't him, it was Randy from Boise, whom I'd expect to know better.

Re: 'Paddo Vigilant' wrote something - again

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 11:07 pm
by Stanistani
Abd wrote:
JuiceBeetle wrote:
Abd wrote:And they repeat the story that I caused a forum to fail.

Don't take it seriously. Vig hates you deeply, thus he will say any lies about you, just like about any of his victims. In the last 2 months, he contributed nothing of value besides the occasional pointless jokes. His comments are as good as laughing matter, which is the reason I copied it here.

It wasn't him, it was Randy from Boise, whom I'd expect to know better.

The failure of that forum was strictly Wil Sinclair's fault. I was there, over to one side, just watching.

Re: 'Paddo Vigilant' wrote something - again

Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2019 11:26 pm
by Abd
Thanks.

As a historical note, this is about the time when I was banned from Wikipediocracy, and that was related.

Wil was simply unprepared for beiig a wiki owner and I attempted to help. When I short-blocked a person who was making a mess, flooding a page, unresponsive, and she threatened to sue him, he freaked out and desysopped me. And then hosts of problems appeared, he was up a creek without a paddle, facing trolls who really wanted him to fail.

Re: 'Paddo Vigilant' wrote something - again

Posted: Tue Dec 10, 2019 12:06 am
by Abd
Vigilant obsessively follows Sucks, obviously. He read the above and quoted it on a member-only WPO forum. He linked to the above as "revisionist history," and then he gave his own history, fact-free and laden with contempt, as usual. He is anonymous and the anonymous imagine there are no consequences for lying or making shit up. The worst thing I can wish for him is that he must live with himself, at least until he dies and then the stench will carry on for a time.

Every time I've been banned from a place, I found that the RationalWiki trope is true: it's a promotion.

Re: So how about changing the illiterate, inflammatory title

Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 4:34 pm
by Carrite
Stanistani wrote:
Abd wrote:
JuiceBeetle wrote:Don't take it seriously. Vig hates you deeply, thus he will say any lies about you, just like about any of his victims. In the last 2 months, he contributed nothing of value besides the occasional pointless jokes. His comments are as good as laughing matter, which is the reason I copied it here.

It wasn't him, it was Randy from Boise, whom I'd expect to know better.

The failure of that forum was strictly Wil Sinclair's fault. I was there, over to one side, just watching.


And I was there, too, and I stand by my (now moved) opinion — which is shared by others.

RfB

Re: So how about changing the illiterate, inflammatory title

Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2019 9:01 am
by JuiceBeetle
Carrite wrote:And I was there, too, and I stand by my (now moved) opinion — which is shared by others.

I've merged the boredbird-Abd discussions, your comment moved as a part of it.

Re: So how about changing the illiterate, inflammatory title

Posted: Fri Dec 13, 2019 3:58 am
by Carrite
JuiceBeetle wrote:
Carrite wrote:And I was there, too, and I stand by my (now moved) opinion — which is shared by others.

I've merged the boredbird-Abd discussions, your comment moved as a part of it.


No worries.

tim