https://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewto ... 79#p300367
I think one of the funniest things about seeing these dimwits discussing my/!my socks, is they don't actually discuss the posts they make.
Which is pretty stupid.
Someone with a cool sounding nickname could exploit it.
After all, is it really all that convincing, you claiming to be offended by someone pretending to be black (and I think I missed the part where you proved they aren't?), when you don't seem in the least bit interested in their comment.....
And seriously, who is the one daydreaming when they look past a post that says....What percentage of editors of this [Wikipedia:Black Lives Matter] project are black, and how does that compare to the demographics of the USA, or even the world?
Me, I'm totally fine with this sort of attention. It's good eatin'.[Wikipedia Administrators] are allowed to make obviously false statements on Wikipedia, proveably false and wholly defamatory, but the powers that be at Wikipedia, because they have no regulator, and no real interest in being seen to have a role in how Wikipedia decides who can and cannot be an Administrator, have overseen a situation where your only real remedy is to sue.
I still see no upside to admitting these are my posts though.
I'm actually quite shocked these morons are pushing me to claim them, given that if I did, well, fuck me if I couldn’t then nail them to the wall for not caring a damn about the issues they raise? Some Wikipedia critics!
I could dine out for years on the fact that for example, I created a sock to highlight the fact Wikipedia has a Black Lives Matter Project that doesn't have a single black person as a member, and the only thing Wikipediocracy wanted to do, was attack me! Call ME a racist!?!. Me, the guy highlighting Wikipedia racism.
Fools. But if I know anything about these dipshits, is that they are consistent dipshits.
I actually think Vigilant checked out years ago. He couldn't think of something substantive to say on these topics even if he tried.
Pretty sad to see him reduced to having to be happy about having a moron like Hemenchuia as a bunk mate. Go on Vigilant, I dare you. Say something interesting about these topics. Show people you still have a clue.
Show people you have an interest here beyond insulting me, because it's becoming pretty fucking clear you only pop in to say mean hurtful things that would be mean and hurtful if you were actually putting any thought into this dumb shit (it's cute you think someone living on the dole and in a tenement has the time and energy I have to expend on such frippery).
The saddest thing here Vigilant, is that you dumbed yourself down to Hemenchuia's level years ago. He's attracted to Wikipediocracy because he sees your current state, and thinks that's what the site is all about. He doesn't realise (because he's an ignorant moron) that back in the day, you'd have had someone like him on toast.
Hemenchuia is relying on you to give him some street cred, rub some of that former glory off on him. Don't let him down. Tell him you agree with something he says, something about Wikipedia and racism, or Wikipedia and its defaming Admins.
I'm genuinely curious how far you are prepared to lower yourself, simply because you're clearly hugely annoyed that I'm right, that you're beyond past it, and you're now simply jealous that I can do what you used to do, but way better, and without sane people seeing me as a threat. The ONLY people afraid of me, who think me/!me deserves a Global Ban, are the people doing the bad shit. You fucking wish you could get your reputation back to that level.
Me, I don't see a dimwit like Hemenchuia as a threat to my work. He makes me look fucking great, to use Jake's claim about me, but in a way that is credible. Hemenchuia is the exact sort of person a serious Wikipedia critic is meant to be reducing to a gibbering wreck, unable as he is to remember all those times it's been pointed out these socks aren't trying to play a character, so why does he keep stroking his dick like he's clever for having spotted them? The clue is in the name. OBVIOUS SOCK.
Fucking winds me up, this shit. You should be fucking decking him on basic fucking principle. He's next level thick. Kumioko thick. This is why I, and a lot of other people it seems, lost all respect for you.
He has no fucking idea, seemingly, that the whole point of them is to make sure people realise, for example, that when Wikipedia is confronted with a black person who asks if there are any black people on their BLM project, they CANCEL THAT NIGGER, STAT.
The whole fucking point is to to show Wikipedia and Wikipediocracy are as one, both thinking that a black person coming to Wikipedia with a black perspective, should be viewed with suspicion. He should be asked for his black papers, and he should have his privacy invaded.
Hopefully now you're appreciating the wisdom of never explicitly claiming such a sock. They can never prove it's me, so they're never going to have the safety net they need. And that is how it should be. Evil people need to live in fear that the next time they shot that gun, they could be shooting an innocent black man. And you know what happens then.
I couldn't have written a better review or indeed endorsement of my/!my work than this.....
It's understandable of course that they think, for some batshit reason, that justifying yourself and finding the best attack is wrong, because....Typical Crow. He always bends over backwards in every post he makes to justify himself and to find whatever angle he thinks is the best to attack Wikipedia or his opponents
YOU'RE NOT FUCKING WIKIPEDIA CRITICS.
In Hemenchuia's case, ever, in Vigilant's case, anymore.
Come on guys. This is too easy.
You suck. You even suck at sucking.
You're only good for sucking each other off in embarrassing threads like that, as some sort of sad mutual support group for people BURNED by the Mighty Crow.