New WPO blogpost - "Nihonjoe Has Been Naughty"

For serious discussion of the "major" forum for Wikipedia criticism and how it fails.
User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4632
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1158 times
Been thanked: 1850 times

Re: New WPO blogpost - "Nihonjoe Has Been Naughty"

Post by ericbarbour » Thu Apr 18, 2024 5:08 am

Is someone starting to snipe at Eric Jepson? You betcha.....Drmies is. Jepson's talkpage was already filling up with people criticizing him for posting non-notable or junk articles. But when this happens.....

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... #Topic_ban

Dumbass doesn't realize that Drmies is a crazy bastard, and will go after his jugular if given half the chance.

Those fuckers can deplore Wikipediocracy and WS all they want--but they use these websites to watch each other.

(Meanwhile, Timmy keeps making a damn fool of himself on the WPO thread. Wherein the others document one attempt after another by Nihonjoe to weasel out of his punishment. Sad!)
Last edited by ericbarbour on Thu Apr 18, 2024 5:29 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
boredbird
Sucks Mod
Posts: 519
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 3:24 am
Has thanked: 659 times
Been thanked: 302 times

Re: New WPO blogpost - "Nihonjoe Has Been Naughty"

Post by boredbird » Thu Apr 18, 2024 11:30 pm

ericbarbour wrote:
Thu Apr 18, 2024 4:26 am
After much blathering, the Mickey Mouse Club ordered the setup of a "VRT" system to submit COI reports to themselves directly.
How can we simulate the virtues of transparency while keeping everything a secret?

Historically, this "private evidence" process has resulted in those who provide it being banned ("Defender of Satan" or whatever his username was comes to mind.) At best it amounts a self-inflicted gag order against the submitter, at worst It's like submitting evidence against the mafia to the NYPD.

It's a central feature of this case that senior functionaries, including the arbitrators like Phillip "Primefag" Timko, are COI editors themselves and cannot be trusted.

Post Reply