Wikipedia and phony memory creation
Posted: Tue Mar 10, 2020 3:39 pm
i discovered the author of this article (https://www.nature.com/news/how-faceboo ... ry-1.21596) contributing heavily to the Wikipedia article on the Spanish Flu pandemic, working with a team of single-purpose accounts to insert material from her book hypothesizing that the pandemic was China's fault. the article itself is worth a read because it discusses how easy it is to implant (or correct!) fake memories in a population. one of the easiest ways to do so being to supply the desired information through people similar to the target (such as an encyclopedia edited by "regular people just like you"). her name is Laura Spinney (not to be confused with Laura Hale...).
it seems clear Spinney is using Wikipedia as her own private experimental laboratory - are there any statistics on how widespread this is (with independent operators - it's pretty clear Wikipedia itself IS an experimental laboratory, for reasons the article does a good job outlining - populations willing to trust editors "just like them" more than separate authority figures etc)?
it seems clear Spinney is using Wikipedia as her own private experimental laboratory - are there any statistics on how widespread this is (with independent operators - it's pretty clear Wikipedia itself IS an experimental laboratory, for reasons the article does a good job outlining - populations willing to trust editors "just like them" more than separate authority figures etc)?