"Universal Code of Conduct"

Because no one else is doing it--not even the media.
User avatar
Bbb23sucks
Sucker
Posts: 1370
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
Location: The Astral Plane
Has thanked: 1398 times
Been thanked: 281 times

Re: "Universal Code of Conduct"

Post by Bbb23sucks » Mon Apr 24, 2023 3:46 am

Cla68 wrote:
Tue Feb 23, 2021 5:43 pm
If I understand correctly, the "universal code of conduct"'s primary role is to promote "inclusiveness" for marginalized populations to participate in Wikipedia? If so, it's simply the WMF doing it's part to support the current leftist, post-modernist, "woke" push to promote group identity politics and create equality of outcome based on group-identity. If it is actually enforced by the WMF, then it should mean that the WMF would push Wikipedia to have a population of administrators which proportionally better represents the diverse mix of groups present in Western, or world society.

The can of worms that such a push would open, of course, is that Wikipedia editors are encouraged to remain anonymous. So, it would be impossible to know for certain that any editor who puts, "I'm an intersectional, transgender, feminist, non-binary, LGBT, person of color" on their userpage is really that. Then, from being forced to promote those accounts to administrators, the current crowd of administrators, whose whole lives revolve around having Wikipedia functioning the way they want it to, would lose control.

I don't think anything will come of it. The WMF doesn't actually want to open that can of worms, so they'll just be content making it known that they're doing their part to encourage the equality of outcome for oppressed groups, but that the enforcement is out of their hands.
Not remotely leftist. The whole "woke" thing is CIA psyop. Think about it: after the Cold War, Americans economic attitudes have shifted left-wards. To prevent this from happening they needed a distraction, that's why "wokeness" has been pushed: to kill the left. Ever wonder why you constantly hear about people fighting over stupid transgender issues, but nothing about the people being shot in France? That's why.

If you don't know, recently there were protests over a plan to divert water from many towns to a few large multinational farms. ~30,000 people protested including environmentalists, local farmers, and residents. The French government responded by bombing them with over 4,000 grenades in the first hours alone and deployed dozens of helicopters. Later, they prevented people from getting medical help.

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/france/articl ... 731_7.html

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/french-pensio ... 9_234.html

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/france/articl ... 917_7.html

https://www.france24.com/en/europe/2023 ... ir-protest

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/fr ... 023-03-25/

This was on top of the already existing protests. If this happened in China or Russia, this would be breaking news.

Edit: more links

https://quillette.com/2023/04/12/the-ba ... te-soline/

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/police-and-ju ... 0_105.html

Edit 2:

Iowa Republicans are also trying to re-legalize child labour, I bet you have not heard about that in the mainstream news.
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.

User avatar
Bbb23sucks
Sucker
Posts: 1370
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
Location: The Astral Plane
Has thanked: 1398 times
Been thanked: 281 times

Re: "Universal Code of Conduct"

Post by Bbb23sucks » Sat Apr 29, 2023 7:52 pm

Bbb23sucks wrote:
Mon Apr 24, 2023 3:46 am
[...]
Another link (can't edit the original post anymore):

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2023/0 ... s-m20.html

Edit: Another link: https://www.peoplesworld.org/article/di ... ut-a-vote/
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.

User avatar
Bbb23sucks
Sucker
Posts: 1370
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
Location: The Astral Plane
Has thanked: 1398 times
Been thanked: 281 times

More bureaucratic UCoC nonsense

Post by Bbb23sucks » Sat Sep 09, 2023 7:24 am

"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.

Post Reply