Wikipedia Sucks!

Yeahhhh, right. Wonder how long this little experiment will last. WP articles STILL tend to be short and information-free--unless something was diddled by crazy people, then it will be very long and difficult to summarize.

https://arstechnica.com/information-tec ... answerbot/

ericbarbour wrote: ↑

Wed Mar 08, 2023 8:08 pm

Yeahhhh, right. Wonder how long this little experiment will last. WP articles STILL tend to be short and information-free--unless something was diddled by crazy people, then it will be very long and difficult to summarize.

https://arstechnica.com/information-tec ... answerbot/

As mentioned I never thought much of the duck (in terms of providing privacy), now the bill for tapping lots of incorrect free content seems to be coming due; relying on Wikipedia is quite a canard and that is not funny but it is punny.

As you noted elsewhere: Jimbo thinks this is a "Interesting idea" ha ha ha. Fucking libertarians always want their slave labor as cheap and conflict-free as possible.

https://www.standard.co.uk/business/wik ... 71107.html

FUCK YOU JIMBO

“Using AI to triple the number of Wikipedia entries wouldn’t increase our running costs by more than £1,000 a year,” said Wales.

ericbarbour wrote: ↑

Sun Apr 09, 2023 11:06 pm

As you noted elsewhere: Jimbo thinks this is a "Interesting idea" ha ha ha. Fucking libertarians always want their slave labor as cheap and conflict-free as possible.

https://www.standard.co.uk/business/wik ... 71107.html

FUCK YOU JIMBO

“Using AI to triple the number of Wikipedia entries wouldn’t increase our running costs by more than £1,000 a year,” said Wales.