"Wikipedia Bans Breitbart as a Source"

Because no one else is doing it--not even the media.
Post Reply
User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4626
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1158 times
Been thanked: 1848 times

"Wikipedia Bans Breitbart as a Source"

Post by ericbarbour » Tue Oct 09, 2018 4:41 am

https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/arti ... t-infowars

And who started it? Guy Chapman!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... _Breitbart

This has been squabbled over for many years. MANY. Always stupid and petty, usually ignored.
I found one from 2010. And I don't see VICE mentioning any of THOSE old arguments.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... bart_again

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... ty_Dispute

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... as_News_RS

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4626
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1158 times
Been thanked: 1848 times

Re: "Wikipedia Bans Breitbart as a Source"

Post by ericbarbour » Tue Oct 09, 2018 5:00 am

And I checked. And Wikipedia currently has 1,632 links to breitbart.com. They had already removed the links in article space. Nearly ALL of the remaining links are on noticeboards and talkpages, being given as examples of Breitbart's "evil". Or whatever someone doesn't like. Do they now start censoring those links?

The nits have also been trying to remove articles about Breitbart writers. AND FAILING.
(Crowder is most famous for one thing: originating the "Change My Mind" meme.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... en_Crowder
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... aron_Klein
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... Julia_Hahn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... lex_Marlow

Post Reply