You gotta love Wikipedia Administrators. They are nothing if not useless scum. It wasn't long ago that Moneytrees was exhorting his colleagues to come assist him in the area of copyright cleanup.
https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/vie ... =13&t=2197
And yet here he is on Wikipediocracy explaining that for a while now, presumably because of the backlog, he, ONE OF THE ALLEGED COMMITTED AND HARD WORKING SPECIALISTS IN THIS AREA, has just been phoning it in, concentrating on quantity not quality, and thus doing a terrible job....
Deleting it because it's PROBABLY copied? Wow. This is the problem with the new breed of Administrator, and indeed the problem with any Administrator nominated for greatness by that useless fuckstick Ritchie333, they haven't the first clue what Wikipedia is meant to be.We've been taking broader strokes in deleting stuff from serial violators recently......so not much will be missed. That's the thing with most articles and contributors who mass produce articles and end up at CCI; there is so much crap to go through that's its just not worth doing a comprehensive check on an article; deleting it because it's probably copied and also terrible is simply easier. I try to stub an article down to a few sentences when I can, but I recognize that a lot of articles should simply be blown up.
Wikipedia is a volunteer effort, so what Wikipedia needs to be is a place where the people who can't do a specific job that needs more hands, can be inspired and learn from people who are doing it right.
Moneytrees is not that person. Moneytrees was probably never all that good at copyright cleanup to begin with, and his sad addiction to the gamification PEEOWWWW PEEEEEOWWWW gotcha element of Wikipedia, has only made him even worse.
Would you be inspired by a useless twat like that? Would you want to volunteer your time to a community that probably doesn't even know and probably cares even less that this is how their copyright cleanup works? And if they do know, probably cheers him on for his RUTHLESS EFFISHUNCY?
Fuck that, is what I would say. If you're not paying me, then you better fucking make sure you don't expect me to do the same shit more than once because your stupid asses are just too lazy and ignorant to do your fucking bit properly.
I think the most disgusting element of this of course is the way he says one thing on Wikipedia, another on Wikipediocracy, in the sure fire knowledge most Wikipedia editors don't read that shit. He's clearly there for the same reason Beeblebrox and all the other scum are, not for an honest accounting of their damage to society as part of a pernicious cult doomed to fail at its ONE JOB for systemic reasons, but simply to get some therapeutic fellatio from Uncle Jake.
But that's just me. Probably why I'm considered too hostile and too ideologically pure for the Wikipediocracy forum.
You watch. Those sellouts will be offering him mint tea soon. The poor baby.
I suppose it makes sense. If Wikipedia actually died as a result of a catastrophic hemorrhaging of volunteers, those sad bastards would be as lost for what to do with their pathetic lives as the editors themselves. Isn't that a thought.....