Page 2 of 2
Re: Weeaboo Crap
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2023 9:45 am
by Bbb23sucks
Don't forget about
Niabot. Not only does he have an extensive library of "not CP" anime (that is even featured prominently and uncensored on his userpage), but he even went as far as to defend Beta M extensively when that happened. How much do you want to bet that he is a pedo?
He also did all sorts of WP:POINT nonsense about the WMF and "stupid Americans" censoring him. Case in point:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.p ... edirect=no
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.p ... 7C29065952
They even featured his
child pornography educational content on the front page:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File ... ersion.jpg
Re: Weeaboo Crap
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2023 10:20 am
by Bbb23sucks
Re: Weeaboo Crap
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2023 7:08 pm
by ericbarbour
lol
That's right, little man, roll over and show them your belly. Waste of time. They will probably ban you anyway.
Re: Weeaboo Crap
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2023 1:02 pm
by Bbb23sucks
Re: Weeaboo Crap
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2023 5:36 am
by Bbb23sucks
Re: Weeaboo Crap
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2023 1:07 pm
by Bbb23sucks
Don't forget about this nonsense:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Loli ... _Manga.jpg
This is hilarious:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Loli ... mageboards
Yes - you read that right, they were fighting over how many CP sites they should directly link to.
Re: Weeaboo Crap
Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2023 7:08 pm
by Bbb23sucks
If you want to see some truly insane all-caps screeching and edit-warring look no further than here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... &limit=500
The original VPP discussion about the image can be found here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... at_Lolicon
Re: Weeaboo Crap
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2023 7:02 am
by Bbb23sucks
Re: Weeaboo Crap
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2023 9:43 pm
by ericbarbour
Missed that the first time. Thanks for the reminder: in early 2006, pedos were encouraging each other to edit WP, because they seriously thought it was "childlove-friendly". Because they got away with it at first--partly because a few insiders (Coetzee, Niabot, Stefan4, Mattbuck and a few others) supported them, especially on Commons. Between this and the final infini-banning of Beta M in 2012, there was a STAGGERING amount of editwarring and fighting. And they really don't like to talk about it today.
If you have the superhuman patience, read this.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.p ... block_log)
Re: Weeaboo Crap
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2023 9:50 pm
by Bbb23sucks
ericbarbour wrote: ↑Mon Dec 11, 2023 9:43 pm
Missed that the first time. Thanks for the reminder: in early 2006, pedos were encouraging each other to edit WP, because they seriously thought it was "childlove-friendly". Because they got away with it at first--partly because a few insiders (Coetzee, Niabot, Stefan4, Mattbuck and a few others) supported them, especially on Commons. Between this and the final infini-banning of Beta M in 2012, there was a STAGGERING amount of editwarring and fighting. And they really don't like to talk about it today.
If you have the superhuman patience, read this.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.p ... block_log)
Apparently this is "rare" according to Reddiots:
https://old.reddit.com/r/wikipedia/comm ... y/kcb715d/