Wikipedia ruled by 'Lord of the Universe'

Good, bad, biased, paid or what-have-you. There's an endless supply.
Post Reply
User avatar
Soham321
Sucks Fan
Posts: 112
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 4:14 pm

Wikipedia ruled by 'Lord of the Universe'

Post by Soham321 » Wed Mar 15, 2017 5:01 am

.
Last edited by Soham321 on Sun Apr 09, 2017 8:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Soham321
Sucks Fan
Posts: 112
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 4:14 pm

Re: Wikipedia ruled by 'Lord of the Universe'

Post by Soham321 » Wed Mar 15, 2017 5:18 am

.
Last edited by Soham321 on Sun Apr 09, 2017 8:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4678
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1184 times
Been thanked: 1880 times

Re: Wikipedia ruled by 'Lord of the Universe'

Post by ericbarbour » Wed Mar 15, 2017 7:03 pm

FWIW the Jossi story is basically "ancient history". You should also include links to the arbitrations. Excellent example of how Wikipedia fails. Jossi had a supporter, a fellow Prem follower called "Momento", to help "protect" him. But they both pissed off Will Beback and Cirt.....Jossi was finally permab&d in December 2008, Momento in 2012. Ugly, ugly mess:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... Prem_Rawat
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... em_Rawat_2

User avatar
Soham321
Sucks Fan
Posts: 112
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 4:14 pm

Re: Wikipedia ruled by 'Lord of the Universe'

Post by Soham321 » Wed Mar 15, 2017 7:23 pm

.
Last edited by Soham321 on Sun Apr 09, 2017 8:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Soham321
Sucks Fan
Posts: 112
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 4:14 pm

Re: Wikipedia ruled by 'Lord of the Universe'

Post by Soham321 » Wed Mar 15, 2017 7:26 pm

.
Last edited by Soham321 on Sun Apr 09, 2017 8:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
HRA1924
Sucks
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2017 6:07 am

Re: Wikipedia ruled by 'Lord of the Universe'

Post by HRA1924 » Thu Mar 16, 2017 11:13 am

Soham321 wrote:
Soham321 wrote:is TimothyJosephWood a devotee of Swami Nithyananda. if not why is he taking so much interest in sanitizing the WP article about Nithyananda?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Swami_Nithyananda&diff=770280681&oldid=770280253


TimothyJosephWood removed the word 'controversial' from the article lead. The reference being used for the word 'controversial' was an article published in a relatively obscure source: Watkins magazine. But only a few edits earlier the reference being used for the 'controversial' word was a BBC article. The BBC reference was swapped for the Watkins reference by another editor*, and then the 'controversial' word was removed by Timothy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Swami_Nithyananda&diff=768970412&oldid=768969459
You can either a) correct it, b) engage somebody on Fiverr to correct it or c) learn the basics of socking - if you want some old autoconfirmed accounts we have thousands of them so giving u 2 or 3 won't make much difference to our stock.

Post Reply