"Fram Gate" in Arbcom

[CrowsNest]

Everyone take note - this is only changing course because of SilkTork and GorillaWarfare.

Noted. Wikipediocracy had zero to do with it.

[CrowsNest]

So, after all that time, all that jibber jabber, the very second it came down to what Fram was going to do to rectify his issues, he threw his toys out the pram and declared he was done with it all.

All hail the martyr....

......Feel free to desysop me if you think that will solve anything instead of making things even worse. If you feel a desysop is in the best interest of enwiki, then you should vote for it. ....... Fram (talk) 14:55, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Asshole to the very end.

[Graaf Statler]

....he threw his toys out the pram and declared he was done with it all.

Asshole to the very end.

Of course he is. He is autistic and if you take such a guy aside and talk with him he understands dammed well he is not able to do this sysop work. These guys are not stupide, no, no, no, they have a handcap.
Fram in combination with professional Trol Drmies have caused a mess. Just like a complete fool as Vig does. Nowhere IRL this guys should be the leaders but on wikipedia is anything possible.
I compared them before with colour blind painters who have to paint the colours of the rainbow. it's complete craziness and deep in there heart they know this dammed, dammed well!

Don't try to fool Statler, guys. Don't try that. You won't.

[Anyone]

Let's take a look at some more disturbing behavior.

Molly -- the Magnificent Madame Warfare -- has just dumped over 7000 words right here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GorillaWarfare/Fram_admin_status_notes

Yes, that nonsense weighs in at over 7000 words. And all because a runty little volunteer moderator got blocked. It's such a terrible waste of time.

I own and operate three companies. If staff fuck up, they get zapped. The whole process takes about five minutes.

Some of you guys might be managers. If your staff fuck up, you kick them out. The process might take a day or so.

But on Wikipedia ..... you've got this sad little jerk [Fram] who's only a volunteer. He isn't even salaried. And yet .... 7000 words.

[JuiceBeetle]

Yes, that nonsense weighs in at over 7000 words. And all because a runty little volunteer moderator got blocked. It's such a terrible waste of time.

The mental expression of the drama-loving editors, who prefer drama to editing (and call themselves "the community"), has produced enough words in wp:fram to fill the books of the Lord of the rings trilogy.
This is what they live for, it's only a waste of time for those, who are here to EDIT the encyclopedia.

[Graaf Statler]

Yes, that nonsense weighs in at over 7000 words. And all because a runty little volunteer moderator got blocked. It's such a terrible waste of time}"]Yes, that nonsense weighs in at over 7000 words. And all because a runty little volunteer moderator got blocked. It's such a terrible waste of time

That's indeed amazing. I was so often blocked, most time for a long periode. At the moment I said good morning, nice weather I was blocked. I won that great SanFanBan. But do you think on WP someone ever spend one single word on it? No, the only thing they did is organising a wiki cafe in the building of my library/ culture centre. Starting my friends to explane the blessings of wikipedia. If I go to the market Saturday I see groups of Wikipedians on a photo safari passing by. But one word about my SanFanBan? No.

These idiots are worser than Jehovah's! They know where I live, they simple come after me I have the feeling!

[Graaf Statler]

Other options include filing various appeals. Running for ArbCom. Appealing to a new ArbCom after the elections. Or doing nothing (either resuming editing or retiring). Oh, I forgot one option: running for the WMF Board (though you have to disclose your identity to do that). There is also the SAR (subject access request) under the GDPR regulations, but that may not be what Fram wants to do.

Ach, just fuck off with your bull, Fram has not any legal option in Europe, shithead. You are just pooping out of your wrong wiki end.

From the beginning it was obvious that there wasn't anything desysop worthy for Fram, but neither is their "conduct" so "pristine" that a straight resysop can be considered.

The shit show has started. Obvious there wasn't anything desysop worthy for Fram, so Fram is generous and give for the benefit of the community himself his tool up.

How generous! Just fuck yourself, Alex Shit. Fuck yourself, lousy idiot with your shit show. You are even to stupide to string your own shoe strings.

[Graaf Statler]

There is also the SAR (subject access request) under the GDPR regulations, but that may not be what Fram wants to do.

Translation: Fram can sue the cop how stoped him for stone dronk driving, but in his goodness he will not do that.


TOTAL FOOL WHAT YOU ARE!

[Graaf Statler]

Updated for clarity: Zoloft linked a new article, which was not in the Katherine Maher twitter thread, that quotes from his 2004 email discussion of a Dutch party that would lower the age of consent (enabling pedaphilia). Again, his naive position is common in European anarchist and libertarian and even liberal political discussions. Again, my position is obviously different, as has been made clear many times (and would be even more clear if moderators had not removed my clearest statements on the exploitation of children).

Oh. What political party was that? Can you give the link? Because I am not aware of any Dutch political party what is advocating this.

[Graaf Statler]

Changed in this by the WO management:

Comparing the WMF's Katherine Maher to Jesus or the Pope was not enough of a clue that I was using "wash his feet" for "to do justice, love kindness, and walk humbly"....