hah, it worked--did not think of that
also, here's another arb-request shitshow with Bbb written all over it
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... e#RHaworth
They should ALL be fired. Talktalktalk, mostly mealymouth nonsense.A large number of this shits in that thread should be banned, as long as they're waving "evidence" against RHayworth around. Because so many of them have done similar things.
Plus,
one of the worst administrators in their history is now bitching about Bbb23. Too little and too late, fucker.
Statement by Jehochman
I think the behavior of all parties needs to be scrutinized, including Bbb23. It is telling that an administrator felt the need to reverse Bbb23’s block. It is also telling that Bbb23 is using Checkuser status to place irreversible blocks that could instead be managed through ordinary consensus-based admin activity. Bbb23 recently demonstrated to me that they may not have the good sense to serve as a Checkuser. If they are added to the case, I will provide the evidence. Jehochman Talk 03:10, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
I find Lepricavark‘s statemet curiously consistent with my own unpleasant experience of trying to talk with Bbb23. Jehochman Talk 03:13, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
To be clear, there should be a case. Rather than the pattern of past years where ArbCom robotically desysops every party, the goal should be to get the parties to agree to raise their standards. With that agreement any faults can be documented and everyone can go about their business. Jehochman Talk 14:16, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
@Bbb23: do you want your actions to be reviewed or would you prefer they not be reviewed? Jehochman Talk 17:44, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
