https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... l_requests
Cool story bro.As a minor note, had I meant to link to FORUMSHOP I would have done so, but I intentionally left it lower-case and un-linked because it is a request at a secondary noticeboard (i.e. "a forum") for something that has already been requested, despite it not being a "Wikipedia FORUMSHOP" issue. Primefac (talk) 18:08, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
It absolutely kills these people to ever admit they were wrong. It is a stone cold fact that on Wikipedia, if you tell someone they are forum shopping, they are going to assume you meant FORUMSHOP, and they will get understandably annoyed if they weren't.
This is abuse of power on Wikipedia in a nutshell. It's not always about who gets blocked, it's who you can make eat your shit, and say thank you for the privilege too.
You will never find a lower ranked user being this much of a smart-cunt to someone above them in the pecking order.
It's this openly tolerated culture of choosing to bullshit someone rather than just do the decent thing and apologise, which leads to (very much) lower ranked wikibuttholes like Davey2010 thinking this....
....was an appropriate way to close the thread.Now go do something worthwhile with your time that doesn't involve wasting everyone elses time.
This sort of stuff doesn't interest Wikipediocracy. You would probably get blocked or abused just for pointing it out. They would much rather you say nothing about scumbags like Primefac, in the hope one day they can be persuaded to become a member, so he and his buddy Beeblebrox can discuss how to change this policy or that procedure, and they can sit around in awe that they chose their little forum to do offishul Wiki business. And of course, chime in with their own suggestions.
But hey, yeah, Wikipediocracy isn't a forum for senior Wikipedia editors.
Whatever you say Jake, you sellout motherfucker.
