Andrew Davison given his marching orders from the deletion battle space
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2021 8:02 pm
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... w_Davidson
Hilarious for all the usual reasons....
1. How long he got away with it (inertia)
2. How much effort it took to eventuallly do something about it (bureaucracy)
3. The lack of anyone asking the real question - is this bloke actualy capable of following basic Wikipedia policy or not? (cowardice, incompetence)
4. Andrew not feeling any particular need to acknowledge or apologise for his behaviour (lack of moral leadership)
He'll not change, he'll simply move to another area, and be just as much of a dick there too. Notably his only response thus far has been to query where his topic ban applies. Never a good sign. It's easy enough to stay away from X, if you actually want to stay away from X.
Probably eventually be banned in five years time.
But at what cost?
I'm not sure the Wikipedia community has ever really understood the true cost of people like Andrew.
Thick bastards.
Hilarious for all the usual reasons....
1. How long he got away with it (inertia)
2. How much effort it took to eventuallly do something about it (bureaucracy)
3. The lack of anyone asking the real question - is this bloke actualy capable of following basic Wikipedia policy or not? (cowardice, incompetence)
4. Andrew not feeling any particular need to acknowledge or apologise for his behaviour (lack of moral leadership)
He'll not change, he'll simply move to another area, and be just as much of a dick there too. Notably his only response thus far has been to query where his topic ban applies. Never a good sign. It's easy enough to stay away from X, if you actually want to stay away from X.
Probably eventually be banned in five years time.
But at what cost?
I'm not sure the Wikipedia community has ever really understood the true cost of people like Andrew.
Thick bastards.