Koavf reverts Doug Weller's revert to Antifa, Bishonen blocks Koavf, and many accusations of trolling and "admin abuse"
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2023 10:20 pm
BADSITEBADSITEBADSITE
https://wikipediasucks.co/forum/
Looks like this is your 20th block
I don't recall anyone with a worse block record. Mostly for edit-warring, a couple for violating a 1RR parole, 5 of them indefinite (the last unblock for an indefinite just over a year ago), some agf unblocked. Doug Weller talk 09:28, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
"I don't see how making clear your block record is harassment."Oops, closer to 28 or 29
Granted you managed to edit for 9 years without a block, then went back to your old ways, mainly being blocked for editwarring/3RR violations and several for violating a 1RR ruling by the Arbitration Committee. You made promises to stop but you couldn't keep them. I don't see how making clear your block record is harassment, it's simply here to give anyone looking at any unblock request some of the background easily. I can of course understand how you wouldn't want me to do that. Doug Weller talk 13:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Wow. I certainly did not expect that. Every wiki-hole is there too voting SUPPORT SUPPORT. Idiots. Koavf was probably Wikipedia's last decent editor too.ChaosMeRee wrote: ↑Fri Jan 05, 2024 3:15 amhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... _unblocked
Looks like Koavf is headed for a site ban. You'll never guess who proposed it.
This guy, posting these nice helpful messages on Koavf's talk page.....
Looks like this is your 20th block
I don't recall anyone with a worse block record. Mostly for edit-warring, a couple for violating a 1RR parole, 5 of them indefinite (the last unblock for an indefinite just over a year ago), some agf unblocked. Doug Weller talk 09:28, 29 December 2023 (UTC)"I don't see how making clear your block record is harassment."Oops, closer to 28 or 29
Granted you managed to edit for 9 years without a block, then went back to your old ways, mainly being blocked for editwarring/3RR violations and several for violating a 1RR ruling by the Arbitration Committee. You made promises to stop but you couldn't keep them. I don't see how making clear your block record is harassment, it's simply here to give anyone looking at any unblock request some of the background easily. I can of course understand how you wouldn't want me to do that. Doug Weller talk 13:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Oh you don't, do you?
Gee, it's SUCH A MYSTERY.
1. You and he have had serious (but insanely petty) beef
2. Why would anyone need your help to read a block log?
3. Why does your effort to "make clear" something contain far more than dry undisputed facts?
The cherry on top is the fact you didn't even bother to mention your prior history as you go about proposing a site ban. Y'know, to make things clear for the passers by. Prick.
You're a weasel cunt, Doug Weller. The EXCACT kind of person I would assume was best friends with a piece of shit like Bishonen and her pet slug Drmies.
These are the real unlockables of Wikipedia.
Look at it. Nobody even dares mention what is happening right infront of their faces (lest they get the same treatment, one imagines).
They all act like it is normal. Acting like these very same people wouldn't go OUT OF THEIR FUCKING MINDS WITH FURIOUS ANGER if the shoe was on the other foot and someone was being this much of an obvious cute little bastard to them and their friends.
*checks Wikipediocracy*
Yup, they could still give a shit.
ScottishFinnishRadish, a good man trying to do a good thing, and they're all over him in forensic detail.
Bishonen and her coven? Crickets.
The fear is palpable.
Pussies.
Desperate stuff.Bbb23sucks wrote: ↑Sat Jan 06, 2024 11:06 amLol. Doug Weller just went on an insane screed about Koavf: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... 1193922746
Bonus points for misspelling Koavf SIX times, in several different ways, too.
Well, Wikipedia has had a good ten years at least to show that being lenient to productive users is a net positive. The signs of failure are all around. The lack of women, for example, who hate edit warring, if you're looking for concrete harms.Boing! said Zebedee wrote: ↑Sun Jan 07, 2024 12:03 pmI can't help thinking the current Koavf thing highlights a fair bit of what's wrong with Wikipedia.
What we have is someone who is very prolific and has contributed a huge amount of content (mostly good, as far as I can see). Occasionally (at fairly lengthy intervals) he gets into a bit of an edit war - but a fixed-term block each time it happens would very likely deal with it just fine. Why would it matter how many times it happens, as long as it's not too frequent and the net result is enthusiastic work to improve content? Any competent organisation would be able to manage someone like Koavf, in a way that gets the best from him over the long term.
But just look at the feeding frenzy that's happening right now, with all manner of would-be enforcers sticking their boots in. If you examined all their actual encyclopedia content work, I wonder how many of them have managed even 1% of Koavf's contributions? And would they come close to him all added together?
I think AN/ANI is getting worse, rather than better with experience - and it attracts far too many people wanting to be enforcers but without having any management or interpersonal competence. But everyone is equal, and "consensus" is all that matters - even though consensus drives away prolific contributors because "da roolz" are more important than actually building an encyclopedia.
The current Wikipedia culture is too far up itself, and I think this case shows it clearly.