Re: Ritchie333
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2019 10:25 am
Oh wow......
Well, maybe this:
Needs no comment, really.....If I might give one piece of advice - don't say "improved phrasing / punctuation", just say "changed phrasing / punctuation". "Improved" carries the implication that whoever wrote the old prose was an uneducated dingbat; whether it is or not, just improve the encyclopedia without rubbing people's noses in it. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:18, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for that contribution—but given that all edits are changes, and that edit summaries are supposed to give some information about the edit, I will carry on exactly as I have in the past. Good day. Harfarhs (talk) 17:21, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Okay, if you find yourself staring at an unblock request, don't say you weren't warned. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:09, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
LOL. Some of us are here to build—and improve—an encyclopaedia. Just concentrate on that rather than on encouraging someone else's passive-aggressive threat. Harfarhs (talk) 21:08, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
That's why I ignored this message and concentrated on getting a 132nd article passed through GA. Have a nice life. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:18, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Well, maybe this: