JuiceBeetle wrote:And I will delete the posts over 5. You could choose which those should be.
Basic forum principle. Respect moderation. Kumioko is violating that principle. On any forum on the planet, attack a moderator as Kumioko has attacked you, you'd be toast, flash-incinerated.
Criticism of moderation must always be within allowed channels. I can criticize the police, but attack them in a way that disrupts the business of the town, I'll have some problems. Kumioko was being severely attacked, and believed that he needed to respond, which, of course, encouraged the attacks to continue. There is a problem here on both sides (with Graaf tossing in more).
The police will tell people to stop fighting, and will not decide who was "right." A moderator can take measures to restrict a user's contributions, and what you have done, Juice, is within discretion. There may be other and maybe better ways, but Kumioko is not negotiating to find them. Instead, he's defiant, demanding to be blocked and then he could complain about it for years. Victory! Really? I'd say if that is what he really wants, give it to him.
In a way, he is confirming CrowsNest's claims. But CrowsNest clearly and intentionally provoked Kumioko. Kumioko remains responsible for his own behavior, but we can note CrowsNest's role, and his style of hate-filled commentary can cause other problems besides Kumioko. It's like Vigilant, and is CrowsNest Sucks' pet Vigilant?
We can do better.