Wikipedia Sucks!

Here are the pages:

• Wikimedia mission statement
• Advocacy (“We stand behind our users!” - Yeah, so much that zero action was taken against Bbb23's tyranny despite of years of obvious misuse.) (“Protecting the right to speak freely” - UNLESS it is criticism of WP administrators. Then get lost.)
• Movement and infrastructure
• Values
• Vision
• Alleged purpose of Wikipedia

Sorry pal, but actions speak louder than words.

What is strange is that Bbb23 massively acted against the mission of the WMF and the alleged purpose of Wikipedia for years, massively violated user privacy, yet noone stopped his tyranny for years.

Users who criticised him were dismissed by him as trolls, and Bbbanned accordingly. Then, all reasonable criticism from users banned by Bbb23 can be invalidated with WP:G5.

And that resignation on April 1st appears somewhat insincere. Not only because of the date, but because of him taking down all criticism from his talk page in the weeks after April 1st.

At least they should reveal their hidden (unwritten) policies, which state that administrators are overlords who can shit on all other rules and user criticism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Wikipedia - No mention of Bbb23 or similar.

Oops, didn't think we'd see? It's right there on WikipediaSucks.co!

“We stand behind our users!”

“Protecting the right to speak freely”

“An interesting unblock occurs on Oct. 5 2015 courtesy of Worm_That_Turned who sets conditions, foremost among them that «You may not comment on administrators as a group, nor on any sysop or desysop procedures.»”