Re: Beeblebrox suspended, humiliated
Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2023 6:35 pm
The revolution appears to be over.
Last act was Boing! engaged in some epic trollery, where he genuinely seemed to think it was unclear what that motion was preventing. A motion that said Beeblebrox had been breaking confidences, ignored a warning, so had had his ability to see confidential information removed for six months. The mystery why some Administrators and their friends are subjected to severe harassment, while others live a quiet life even on ArbCom, remains unsolved! Lol.
As was said at the time, this suspension goes past the end of the year when he was due to step down as an arbitrator and thus lose access to the Arb mailing list, to guide future Committees regarding what crimes should be met with what punishments. And as Boing! already knew, former Arbitrators retain their CheckUser rights even after standing down, so this suspension reassures people he cannot be passing that to his scuzzy mates for at least six months, and probable never if he is never given It back (or never asks for It back).
It remains the case that the only people defending Beeblebrox were two high ranking Wikipedians, Boing! and Mason/28Bytes, who also happen to be regular Wikipediocracy posters. So it seems likely they too have been breaking confidences.
Amusingly, Boing! seems to have antagonised the Arbs so much with his transparent bullshit aimed at slinging as much mud as he could, they have hinted that this isn't over for Beeblebrox, and he will also have to answer to the Ombuds Commission for breaches of his NDA.
Then we presumably get to see the hilarious sight of the Wikipedia community (via their ArbCom bitches) refusing to desysop a Administrator who has become the first (of over a hundred) to ever be suspended as an Arb, and has been found to have breached their NDA.
Last act was Boing! engaged in some epic trollery, where he genuinely seemed to think it was unclear what that motion was preventing. A motion that said Beeblebrox had been breaking confidences, ignored a warning, so had had his ability to see confidential information removed for six months. The mystery why some Administrators and their friends are subjected to severe harassment, while others live a quiet life even on ArbCom, remains unsolved! Lol.
As was said at the time, this suspension goes past the end of the year when he was due to step down as an arbitrator and thus lose access to the Arb mailing list, to guide future Committees regarding what crimes should be met with what punishments. And as Boing! already knew, former Arbitrators retain their CheckUser rights even after standing down, so this suspension reassures people he cannot be passing that to his scuzzy mates for at least six months, and probable never if he is never given It back (or never asks for It back).
It remains the case that the only people defending Beeblebrox were two high ranking Wikipedians, Boing! and Mason/28Bytes, who also happen to be regular Wikipediocracy posters. So it seems likely they too have been breaking confidences.
Amusingly, Boing! seems to have antagonised the Arbs so much with his transparent bullshit aimed at slinging as much mud as he could, they have hinted that this isn't over for Beeblebrox, and he will also have to answer to the Ombuds Commission for breaches of his NDA.
Then we presumably get to see the hilarious sight of the Wikipedia community (via their ArbCom bitches) refusing to desysop a Administrator who has become the first (of over a hundred) to ever be suspended as an Arb, and has been found to have breached their NDA.