Political bias and squabbling

User avatar
Ognistysztorm
Sucks Critic
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2022 1:39 am
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 199 times

Re: Political bias and squabbling

Post by Ognistysztorm » Sat Sep 02, 2023 8:19 am

Philomath wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 5:47 am
Yes, please PM me any time.
Done!

User avatar
Ognistysztorm
Sucks Critic
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2022 1:39 am
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 199 times

Re: Political bias and squabbling

Post by Ognistysztorm » Sat Sep 09, 2023 3:58 am

Philomath wrote:
Sat Sep 02, 2023 5:47 am
Yes, please PM me any time.
Anything so far?

User avatar
Philomath
Sucks
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2023 3:34 am
Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 56 times

Re: Political bias and squabbling

Post by Philomath » Sat Sep 09, 2023 9:44 pm

Ah, yes sir. Sorry for not replying to your PM. I found the information very interesting. I'm actually working on another article that includes this information. I won't mention you, unless you'd like me to. Other work has captured my focus this week, the plan is to set aside an hour for Wikipedia-related things this evening. Thanks for following up.

PS - I remember somewhere, on some thread, you suggested a news outlet that might be interested in publishing this kind of work. Can you remind me what that outlet was? Thank you.

User avatar
Ognistysztorm
Sucks Critic
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2022 1:39 am
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 199 times

Re: Political bias and squabbling

Post by Ognistysztorm » Sun Sep 10, 2023 5:10 am

Philomath wrote:
Sat Sep 09, 2023 9:44 pm
Ah, yes sir. Sorry for not replying to your PM. I found the information very interesting. I'm actually working on another article that includes this information. I won't mention you, unless you'd like me to. Other work has captured my focus this week, the plan is to set aside an hour for Wikipedia-related things this evening. Thanks for following up.

PS - I remember somewhere, on some thread, you suggested a news outlet that might be interested in publishing this kind of work. Can you remind me what that outlet was? Thank you.
For privacy reasons, attribution/mention is totally unneccessary (for me). There's that Countere magazine which a user "journo" had brought up many weeks earlier.

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4597
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1141 times
Been thanked: 1842 times

Re: Political bias and squabbling

Post by ericbarbour » Wed Feb 14, 2024 2:33 am

If you think Wikipedia's institutional hatred of "doxing" and "outing" is twisted.....

apparently the Australian government wants to make it a crime.

https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/news/pol ... se-doxxing

User avatar
Bbb23sucks
Sucker
Posts: 1348
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
Location: The Astral Plane
Has thanked: 1281 times
Been thanked: 271 times

Re: Political bias and squabbling

Post by Bbb23sucks » Wed Feb 14, 2024 3:34 am

ericbarbour wrote:
Wed Feb 14, 2024 2:33 am
If you think Wikipedia's institutional hatred of "doxing" and "outing" is twisted.....

apparently the Australian government wants to make it a crime.

https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/news/pol ... se-doxxing
Lol. AND they did it solely because of Israel. Next up it will be mandatory to have a poster in your home reading "Jews don't control the world".
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.

User avatar
Ognistysztorm
Sucks Critic
Posts: 373
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2022 1:39 am
Has thanked: 68 times
Been thanked: 199 times

Re: Political bias and squabbling

Post by Ognistysztorm » Wed Feb 14, 2024 5:02 am

ericbarbour wrote:
Wed Feb 14, 2024 2:33 am
If you think Wikipedia's institutional hatred of "doxing" and "outing" is twisted.....

apparently the Australian government wants to make it a crime.

https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/news/pol ... se-doxxing
Appears likely to become part of the force that will destroy Wikipedia, since in the UAP community a petition is circulating around calling for greater attention to Wikipedia's problems.

https://www.change.org/p/demand-wikiped ... nformation

User avatar
Bbb23sucks
Sucker
Posts: 1348
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2023 9:08 am
Location: The Astral Plane
Has thanked: 1281 times
Been thanked: 271 times

Re: Political bias and squabbling

Post by Bbb23sucks » Fri Mar 01, 2024 8:38 am

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workers_Party_of_Britain

Real-time edit warring. I can't really figure out the sides right now.

The party's founder's article dates back to 2003 and has been edit warred for most of its existence: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Galloway
"Globally banned" since September 5, 2023 for exposing harassment.

User avatar
badmachine
Sucker
Posts: 455
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:55 am
Has thanked: 553 times
Been thanked: 259 times
Contact:

Re: Political bias and squabbling

Post by badmachine » Fri Mar 01, 2024 2:40 pm

Al-Rashid humanitarian aid incident

large squabble on the talk page over the article title. it was briefly moved to "Al-Rashid massacre" after a snowstorm of support, but this morning it has been moved back to Al-Rashid humanitarian aid incident.

already two sections have been 'hatted', and some not-so-clever comments within the hidden section
reply to a badgering IP wrote:Aren't users with <500 edits disallowed to comment on talk pages in this fashion? The user you're replying to has like, ten edits in total. Tdmurlock (talk) 00:05, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
reply to a struck comment wrote:According to the rules, you are not allowed to comment here. Hazooyi (talk) 07:50, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
and so on and so on and scooby dooby dooby...

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 4597
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1141 times
Been thanked: 1842 times

Re: Political bias and squabbling

Post by ericbarbour » Fri Mar 01, 2024 9:53 pm

Bbb23sucks wrote:
Fri Mar 01, 2024 8:38 am
The party's founder's article dates back to 2003 and has been edit warred for most of its existence: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Galloway
He's a long-notorious critic of Israel, making him a constant target for abuse by the Wiki Zionist gang. They have lost a lot of political power since 2009 but still keep trying. And the "Philip Cross" freak who was out to get Galloway was restricted from editing all recent UK-politics content in a 2018 arbitration.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... Talk_Shows
AFDed by none other than David Gerard, using classically specious logic.

Is "Mr. Cross", outrageous enough to be covered by mainstream media, being defended by insiders? What do you think?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... ikipedian)

Old threads:
https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/vie ... f=19&t=619
https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/vie ... f=11&t=625

Post Reply