Political bias and squabbling

[Ognistysztorm]

Yes, please PM me any time.

Done!

[Ognistysztorm]

Yes, please PM me any time.

Anything so far?

[Philomath]

Ah, yes sir. Sorry for not replying to your PM. I found the information very interesting. I'm actually working on another article that includes this information. I won't mention you, unless you'd like me to. Other work has captured my focus this week, the plan is to set aside an hour for Wikipedia-related things this evening. Thanks for following up.

PS - I remember somewhere, on some thread, you suggested a news outlet that might be interested in publishing this kind of work. Can you remind me what that outlet was? Thank you.

[Ognistysztorm]

Ah, yes sir. Sorry for not replying to your PM. I found the information very interesting. I'm actually working on another article that includes this information. I won't mention you, unless you'd like me to. Other work has captured my focus this week, the plan is to set aside an hour for Wikipedia-related things this evening. Thanks for following up.

PS - I remember somewhere, on some thread, you suggested a news outlet that might be interested in publishing this kind of work. Can you remind me what that outlet was? Thank you.

For privacy reasons, attribution/mention is totally unneccessary (for me). There's that Countere magazine which a user "journo" had brought up many weeks earlier.

[ericbarbour]

If you think Wikipedia's institutional hatred of "doxing" and "outing" is twisted.....

apparently the Australian government wants to make it a crime.

https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/news/pol ... se-doxxing

[Bbb23sucks]

If you think Wikipedia's institutional hatred of "doxing" and "outing" is twisted.....

apparently the Australian government wants to make it a crime.

https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/news/pol ... se-doxxing

Lol. AND they did it solely because of Israel. Next up it will be mandatory to have a poster in your home reading "Jews don't control the world".

[Ognistysztorm]

If you think Wikipedia's institutional hatred of "doxing" and "outing" is twisted.....

apparently the Australian government wants to make it a crime.

https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/news/pol ... se-doxxing

Appears likely to become part of the force that will destroy Wikipedia, since in the UAP community a petition is circulating around calling for greater attention to Wikipedia's problems.

https://www.change.org/p/demand-wikiped ... nformation

[Bbb23sucks]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workers_Party_of_Britain

Real-time edit warring. I can't really figure out the sides right now.

The party's founder's article dates back to 2003 and has been edit warred for most of its existence: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Galloway

[badmachine]

Al-Rashid humanitarian aid incident

large squabble on the talk page over the article title. it was briefly moved to "Al-Rashid massacre" after a snowstorm of support, but this morning it has been moved back to Al-Rashid humanitarian aid incident.

already two sections have been 'hatted', and some not-so-clever comments within the hidden section

Aren't users with <500 edits disallowed to comment on talk pages in this fashion? The user you're replying to has like, ten edits in total. Tdmurlock (talk) 00:05, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

According to the rules, you are not allowed to comment here. Hazooyi (talk) 07:50, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

and so on and so on and scooby dooby dooby...

[ericbarbour]

The party's founder's article dates back to 2003 and has been edit warred for most of its existence: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Galloway

He's a long-notorious critic of Israel, making him a constant target for abuse by the Wiki Zionist gang. They have lost a lot of political power since 2009 but still keep trying. And the "Philip Cross" freak who was out to get Galloway was restricted from editing all recent UK-politics content in a 2018 arbitration.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... Talk_Shows
AFDed by none other than David Gerard, using classically specious logic.

Is "Mr. Cross", outrageous enough to be covered by mainstream media, being defended by insiders? What do you think?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... ikipedian)

Old threads:
https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/vie ... f=19&t=619
https://www.wikipediasucks.co/forum/vie ... f=11&t=625