When I looked at Britannica they stated that "During World War II the Germans established more than 200 labour, prison, and concentration camps (e.g., Majdanek and Sobibór) in the area." They concisely list a few details, outline an overview, and provide context.SkepticalHistorian wrote: ↑Sun Mar 05, 2023 1:31 amGrabowski et.al. realize this gas chamber in the Warsaw Concentration camp was phony*, now it’s time for others to point out the absurdity of the other gas chambers.
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warsaw_co ... camp_story
So basically Britannica points out the two major camps in the context of many. What you are noticing is that Wikipedia uses too many words and topics to present countervailing viewpoints that are out of context and therefore are wrong. Both sides are wrong; nobody has an overview, and there is no context. Two different stories can be told (and sold as the truth) in many different articles.
In an encyclopedia "A discredited Warsaw concentration camp" would not be relevant. That is the absurdity here - wtf is total nonsense doing in "an encyclopedia"
What is also relevant is that there are "countervailing narratives" being spun on Wikipedia. In this case Szmenderowiecki and GizzyCatBella are at war with each other. Circa 2021 Szmenderowieki was at war with Volunteer Marek.
The failed Wikipedia process allows any nonsense to get expressed (by anyone) the more conflicting words used and more conflicting topics created the better. A flaw of the Wikipedia process is that folks fight with each other in an effort to win by making a point.
Lets not fall for that nonsense here as the issue is Wikipedia and to that we should agree.
Arbitration Statement by Szmenderowiecki
This is just a sample of what a shitshow is going to happen here once the case is accepted.