Page 1 of 1
"Gays Against Groomers" vs Wikipedia
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2023 4:18 am
by Bbb23sucks
It seems that some anti-trans group has gotten into a beef with Wikipedia:
https://www.radar.gaysagainstgroomers.c ... pedia-page
The talk page is a goldmine:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gays ... t_Groomers
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... &limit=500
At first, there doesn't seem to be much fighting. Scroll back and you'll find all of our favorite patrollers and admins.
Re: "Gays Against Groomers" vs Wikipedia
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:14 pm
by badmachine
the gays shouldve declared victory and closed the gay orgs when we got the right to marry. now the orgs (like GLAAD, HRC, PFLAG, etc) are infiltrated with trannies. in addition to pushing mutilation, these orgs now promote abortion, which isnt traditionally a gay rights issue, e.g.:
GLAAD,
HRC, and
PFLAG
most galling to me personally is
the use of PEPFAR for abortions. the goal of PEPFAR was to save lives, not destroy the most vulnerable lives.
Re: "Gays Against Groomers" vs Wikipedia
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:29 pm
by boredbird
If gays are really fighting trans that makes nearly all editors WP:INVOLVED.
Tamzin says his actual job is to target schools across the country and recruit more trans.
Here's his boyfriend TheresNoTime locking the article.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... t+Groomers
Re: "Gays Against Groomers" vs Wikipedia
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2023 10:55 pm
by ericbarbour
Bbb23sucks wrote: ↑Mon Aug 28, 2023 4:18 am
The talk page is a goldmine
AAAAGGGGHHHHHHH
Even the worst arbitrations weren't as disgusting (or as LONG and UNREADABLE) as this "argument". And what the hell is Dronebogus doing in there? Why does that smug little patroller "care" so much about gay rights?
TheTranarchist is shaping up to be one of their most toxic content grinders. Does nothing but fight with people over transgender and LGBTQ content since 2021. Dollar sez she'll be RFA nominated by Tamzin someday.
Funny how the people doing the most shrieking about authoritarianism are also the most prone to trying their OWN authoritarian political tricks and abuse, eh? Especially on Wikipedia.
Re: "Gays Against Groomers" vs Wikipedia
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2023 11:21 pm
by Bbb23sucks
ericbarbour wrote: ↑Tue Aug 29, 2023 10:55 pm
Even the worst arbitrations weren't as disgusting (or as LONG and UNREADABLE) as this "argument". And what the hell is Dronebogus doing in there? Why does that smug little patroller "care" so much about gay rights?
"Trans rights" actually. Still, I don't know why.
Reminds of a meme I saw that this generation is the first to think that believing what the establishment believes (neoliberal capitalism, "progressive" imperialism, and milquetoast progressive social politics) is "radical".