Wikipedia's admin clique may be ActBlue

[hyatt]

The partisan clique dominating Wikipedia all uniformly deny knowing one another, deny working in PR, deny having an interest in politics while holding positions to the left of Stalin, will tell any lie to back each other up at ANI and ArbCom, and issue quick permanent bans to anyone who notices they are lying or goes slightly off script of any of their pet issues. Not only are they working for Russia and Saudi Arabia, one of the vehicles through which they are likely funded (by Russia) is ActBlue.

ActBlue is run by Zack Exley who also co-founded the New Organizing Institute and was organizing director at MoveOn which forms part of the Avaaz network that is run by the UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office as a front for Hamas. Exley was also chief community officer at Wikipedia from 2010-2013, giving him and his friends a few years to settle in and take over.

This tweet claims that ActBlue was co-founded by Ian Simmons. I can't find support for that. Whether true or not, Simmons was ActBlue's #2 donor one year. Simmons is also a member of the Social Finance network of Sir Ronald Cohen whose Tracy Palandjian was recently in the news for defending Harvard's plagaiarist president Claudine Gay. Sir Ronald Cohen runs Apax Partners which was in the news for having business ties to Russia that were suspiciously scrubbed off the Internet in very early September 2014, which might be a reaction to something that had happened in August 2014. I can't say it's a confirmation, but I can say it's suspicious. It connects the dots.

[ericbarbour]

ActBlue is run by Zack Exley who also co-founded the New Organizing Institute and was organizing director at MoveOn which forms part of the Avaaz network that is run by the UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office as a front for Hamas. Exley was also chief community officer at Wikipedia from 2010-2013, giving him and his friends a few years to settle in and take over.

Good point. Every organization Exley ever worked for or helped found has a WP article....that shows the same signs of being carefully edited by a succession of "single issue" sockpuppets. Often the SAME sockpuppets, circulating. Same goes for Exley's bio and the bio of his buddy Saikat Chakrabarti. This is all material that "MUST" never say anything bad or negative, because Wikipedians will it. (Try asking them who "AleatoryPonderings" is.)

https://xtools.wmcloud.org/articleinfo/ ... _Democrats
https://xtools.wmcloud.org/articleinfo/ ... w_Congress
https://xtools.wmcloud.org/articleinfo/ ... org/MoveOn
https://xtools.wmcloud.org/articleinfo/ ... rg/ActBlue
https://xtools.wmcloud.org/articleinfo/ ... hakrabarti

The New Organizing Institute's article was mostly written by one sock. Which was permabanned for being a sock farm. Employee of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, I'm guessing. Did a bad job of covering it up.
https://xtools.wmcloud.org/articleinfo/ ... _Institute
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Safehaven86
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ... vp/Archive

The CEPR article shows a similar edit pattern.
https://xtools.wmcloud.org/articleinfo/ ... y_Research