wow, david gerard

Please keep complaints about Gerard's pathetic maunderings to this ghetto, thank you very much
Post Reply
User avatar
Lir
Sucks
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2024 1:32 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 35 times

wow, david gerard

Post by Lir » Sun Jan 07, 2024 2:00 pm

That's a name from 20 years ago!

What a disgusting individual.

It says a lot about Wikipedia that people like that are still around.

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 5243
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1420 times
Been thanked: 2184 times

Re: wow, david gerard

Post by ericbarbour » Tue May 14, 2024 11:15 pm

Despite losting his main account powerz long ago, I still think he's running a sockpuppet (Maxim) that is currently serving as an arbitrator. Put THAT in your pipe and smoke it (along with some hash to make the misery a bit more tolerable).

Also:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Gerard_(author)

User avatar
badmachine
Sucker
Posts: 562
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:55 am
Has thanked: 769 times
Been thanked: 348 times
Contact:

Re: wow, david gerard

Post by badmachine » Sun Jul 13, 2025 1:40 pm

looks like Gerard resigned before anyone put the boot in. link

User avatar
ericbarbour
Sucks Admin
Posts: 5243
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:56 am
Location: The ass-tral plane
Has thanked: 1420 times
Been thanked: 2184 times

Re: wow, david gerard

Post by ericbarbour » Mon Jul 14, 2025 6:14 am

badmachine wrote:
Sun Jul 13, 2025 1:40 pm
looks like Gerard resigned before anyone put the boot in. link
lol, and he said he would resign as bureaucrat, and no one should vote for him.....
I thought about this today and realised: if I had an RFA, would I vote for me? And the answer is, no, I probably wouldn't. Simply from inactivity. I'm not actually around here much, you'll see stretches of weeks with no edits in my edit history, and I'm not active around the various administrative boards, in fact I've been consciously avoiding them because they feel like a waste of my time. That's the opposite of what an admin should be doing.

I'm intensely busy right now and my Wikipedia editing is mostly drive-by. That's not a good way to do admin either, as this incident shows.

Given that, I've sent a note to the bureaucrats that I'm resigning my bit.

In the unlikely event I want to go for admin again, I'd do it via an RFA, in which this discussion would no doubt be a topic.

I expect to keep editing casually. Have fun and see you around on occasion.

- David Gerard (talk) 18:11, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
The pedantic little ASSHOLES paid no attention to Gerard's 20+ year history of abusing his power to protect friends and silence critics and control content. All the twits moaned about was RECENT abuses.

Won't go into details, because I've ALREADY posted his history before, and it didn't matter.
Last edited by ericbarbour on Mon Jul 14, 2025 6:15 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
boredbird
Sucks Mod
Posts: 654
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 3:24 am
Has thanked: 834 times
Been thanked: 407 times

Re: wow, david gerard

Post by boredbird » Mon Jul 14, 2025 9:01 am

Gerard helped set the expectation early on that wikipedia should be run by kooks and freaks. EVERYONE felt normal next to David Gerard. And with no obvious qualifications besides very strong opinions.

It looks like he's finally gotten serious, looks sort of normal and has written several books, reviewed in the New York Times.

And, with that, he finally backs away from Wikipedia.

Post Reply