You can talk about anything related to Wikipedia criticism here.
-
Ognistysztorm
- Sucks Warrior
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2022 1:39 am
- Has thanked: 77 times
- Been thanked: 261 times
Post
by Ognistysztorm » Fri Jul 25, 2025 9:27 pm
boredbird wrote: ↑Sun Jul 20, 2025 9:34 pm
So what was their response? Besides changing attorneys. Maybe something like "this person is mentally ill can't believe a word they say?"
Now we got another update.
SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is set for trial on this Court's four-week docket beginning July 6, 2026. Counsel and the parties shall be ready for trial on two days' notice at any time during this four-week period. Joinder of Parties due by 9/22/2025. Amended Pleadings due by 9/22/2025. Motions due by 3/9/2026. Deadline for mediation is on or before 1/7/2026. Discovery due by 2/6/2026. Pretrial Order due by 6/11/2026. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 7/23/2025) (jnp)
-
boredbird
- Sucks Mod
- Posts: 662
- Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2017 3:24 am
- Has thanked: 842 times
- Been thanked: 409 times
Post
by boredbird » Mon Jul 28, 2025 11:36 pm
Ognistysztorm wrote: ↑Sun Jul 20, 2025 7:26 pm
There's been a few updates in the relevant PACER docket by now.
How did Wikimedia respond, can you see the doc?
-
Ognistysztorm
- Sucks Warrior
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2022 1:39 am
- Has thanked: 77 times
- Been thanked: 261 times
Post
by Ognistysztorm » Wed Jul 30, 2025 7:15 pm
boredbird wrote: ↑Mon Jul 28, 2025 11:36 pm
Ognistysztorm wrote: ↑Sun Jul 20, 2025 7:26 pm
There's been a few updates in the relevant PACER docket by now.
How did Wikimedia respond, can you see the doc?
No, I don't have a PACER subscription, but maybe you can make a shared account and subscription on PACER for all of us here?
