EU Copyright directive passes

[Graaf Statler]

https://twitter.com/MehreenKhn/status/1 ... 4176384000

384 against 274 votes. A large majority.

[Graaf Statler]

https://twitter.com/jimmy_wales/status/ ... 1305095171

Where can I see a name-by-name breakdown with party/group affiliation and country delegation for today's lost vote which was lost by 5?

Here Jimmy, so we can see it all. I already had found it.

https://juliareda.eu/wp-content/uploads ... htvote.pdf

https://twitter.com/jimmy_wales/status/ ... 6365044736

You, the Internet user, have lost a huge battle today in Internet parliament. The free and open internet is being quickly handed over to corporate giants at the expense of ordinary people. This is not about helping artists, it is about empowering monopolistic practices.

No, Jimmy, the pirate wikipedians lost because they didn't play fair. And you too didn't play fair. And that is the real reason you have lost.

And tweets on the Wikimedia tweet like this are of course far out of line. Or better a huge scandal.
The 4th Reich attacks again, and a N*azi flag half over the European flag.

https://twitter.com/FellFernandz/status ... 1581134848

It is about time for introspection, isn't it Jimmy? Wikipedia is accused of practicing politics, and the pirates of fraud with bots and undermining the European politics. These are serious accusations, special if they are done on a high European level and if Guy Verhofstad, AlexVoss and Frans Timmermans are involved, Jimmy. Very serious accusations. It wouldn't surplice me if this will be followed by a official investigation of the EU. And we have a saying in Holland, Jimmy.

Wie geschoren wordt moet heel stil zitten.

Don't move if you are saved Jimmy, don't move. Sit very still and wait for the things what are coming.

[Graaf Statler]

https://wikimediafoundation.org/2019/03 ... ight-vote/

Pffffff........... Controversial, Gerlach and Davenport?
With 348 against 271 votes? Controversial? After all the "lobbying" of the free source movement? I don't think so. I think, no I am sure it is and it was all bullshit.
And I don't think this will harm free knowledge, because most of that "knowledge was never free, it is simple stolen.
Years of discussions with trolly trolling Romaine and friends? Give me a break the two of you. While we are disappointed, the fight is not over you write in your posting.

Well, I have extreem bad news for you, for you is the fight over, now. No one will listen anymore to you, and I am wondering if The Parate Party will be reelected in May. Because I don't think so. Why?
Because that hot summer only was in your heads and the only thing what was hot was the soup in the restaurant of the Europarlement. Try first to get some political support, and than we can talk. But till that time the game is over for you.

[Graaf Statler]

https://twitter.com/jimmy_wales/status/ ... 9287983111

I want to look at the impact that Wikipedia protests had.

What impact do yourself think it had? With Romaine, specialist in bot-trolling and trolling in general, Reda who doesn't have a clou about European politics and European copyright and Pirate Party kid Dimi, our man in Brussels?
With a clever lawyer as Alex Voss? And a Pirate Party without any political support in Europe?
And asking people to call their MEP what no one ever will do here in Europe, because that is not common? What impact do yourself think that has Jimmy? That it will impress a parlement what works with expert commissions? Special if your "Wikipedia Lobby group" is telling most times lies?

He, Jimmy, because we are living in Europe it doesn't mean we are retarded. And do you really believe there is one person in Europe except a few pirate bay kids who believe Bot-Romaine=>Wikimedia, profession internet troll has collected that 5.000.000 signatures in a decent way? Come on, Jimmy.

[Graaf Statler]

My god, I know Romaine=>wikimedia better than my own brother. Romaine has made trolling to a kind of art. Trusting in the good faith of Romaine and Mdd? With socks and troll masters as Blueknight and De Wikischim? And Trijnstel and the rest of the idiots. Come on Jimmy, what impact do you expect?

[CrowsNest]

I think Jimmy is worried the protests were counter-productive. I think Jimmy is right.

[Graaf Statler]

I think Jimmy is worried the protests were counter-productive. I think Jimmy is right.

Wondering what Jimmy had expected of his Brussels lobbing with a party what does't even check it's candidates for the European Parlement. And a Belgium chapter what is close connected with Hackerspace Brussels, with staring Romaine=>trollomedia, yes, I am a trollbot.

(Hackerspace Brussels (HSBXL) is a space, dedicated to various aspects of constructive & creative hacking. Is destroying three motherboards creative hacking because you can't hack a macbook? I have send the technical proof to Whaledad and Eric in that time. Just a question, because I can never proof who did that, and coincidence exist. Pavarotti on the Dam, you remember? The maps where dancing spontaneously on the desktop, but could clearly not opened. This is of course only a question, I accuse nobody, but is this creative hacking? Just curieus. Damage: three MacBooks in a few mouths. Reason=>hacking, overheating of the motherboard, all three with the same damage.)

Overpaid people in the chapters with complete bullshit jobs, as a outsider you didn't have a change. All extreme poor editors or people who never serious edited Wikipedia. People without any, any legal and political knowledge and I am really, really wondering what students learn in that study politics and publicity sciences at the University of Mainz where Reda has studied. And not forget to mention the wiki lawyers who where not lawyers at all when they stood at the cradle of Wikipedia today. Yes, of course you can start later to study and troll yourself in haven to hide that fact, but at that moment they where not qualified.

Al met al, this doesn't impress and this was indeed not (sic) very productive.