The pro-inclusionism arguments are much stroger than deletionist arguments.

You can talk about anything related to Wikipedia criticism here.
Post Reply
User avatar
CMAwatch
Sucks Critic
Posts: 329
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2019 1:26 pm
Location: Community Moderation Abuse Watch
Has thanked: 109 times
Been thanked: 33 times

The pro-inclusionism arguments are much stroger than deletionist arguments.

Post by CMAwatch » Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:38 am

Compare the inclusionist arguments to deletionist arguments.

Notice how the inclusionist arguments are much, much stronger?

And yet the world's most popular knowledge resource, which proclaims itself as the sum of all knowledge, is infested with digital dementia, also known as deletionism.

At least, they should give alternative wikis the opportunity to import content prior to erasure, or they should paste these articles to them.

Imagine how much useful knowledge and quality content is locked away inside the deletion vaults of Wikimedia data centers, for absurd reasons.
#BbbGate
Weaponizing WP:G5
Oops! Didn't think we'd see? It's right there on WikipediaSucks.co!
ericbarbour wrote:
Wed Sep 09, 2020 4:22 am
[Wikipedia is] a stupid video game, and the "encyclopedia" is an accidental byproduct.

Post Reply