New blog post on San Diego State U. and how it is falling apart
Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2023 9:57 am
https://wikipedia-sucks-badly.blogspot. ... s-not.html
The subreddit on SDSU* did not like this one, even though the facts are there if you can look at the campus; the library is in poor physical shape and still lacks earthquake retrofitting even though the school is near a fault, the Life Sciences complex is kind of a mess, they charge for everything (including stuff that should be for free.) I didn't mention that SDSU President Adela de la Torre now makes nearly half a million a year and lives for free in a house in La Jolla (all of the SDSU Presidents have lived there during their tenures for the last few decades) actually the house is in a gated community nearby the campus, and they actually bought de la Torre a new one in 2018, before she showed up.
*Example of the nonsense:
MaelstromTempest
·
10 hr. ago
Honestly really poor journalism. While it does point out some legitimate issues regarding the need for library funding, the article reeks of resentment and grandstanding. It adds nothing to these discussions except speculation and hearsay with evidence being anecdotal at best. Overall writing is very bad. Never would have flown in an RWS 100 class that’s for sure haha.
6 upvotes
GhostofHeywood12
OP
·
9 hr. ago
I was quoting SDSU professor Peter Herman on the library, you were too lazy to click the links.
-4 downvotes
MaelstromTempest
·
2 hr. ago
And I pointed out that the issue about the library was about the only legitimate claim made in the article.
3 upvotes
GhostofHeywood12
OP
·
2 hr. ago
What about Life Science North? They want to completely replace it, and it is the newer part of the Life Sciences complex. That was mentioned. I didn't mention that the SDSU president now makes about a half-million dollars, and lives rent-free in a gated estate near the college. links in original
-1 downvote
MaelstromTempest
·
1 hr. ago
What about the life sciences building? The article says that it’s an old beat up building, so I guess it should be replaced then? But it doesn’t matter because as you say funding hasn’t been secured so I’m not even sure why that was a point. Is the article for or against it? Who knows, because the writing is god awful. And yes, the SDSU president’s salary is a matter of public record, as well as her housing allowance and the house the university purchased for her. So what? Such arrangements are common throughout various organizations, whether they be public, private, or non-profit. There are absolutely criticisms about the current SDSU president, but again, the reader wouldn’t know about it because of how low level the journalism is.
1 vote
GhostofHeywood12
OP
·
2 hr. ago
Voting me down will not change that.
-3 downvotes
https://www.reddit.com/r/SDSU/comments/ ... ego_state/
The subreddit on SDSU* did not like this one, even though the facts are there if you can look at the campus; the library is in poor physical shape and still lacks earthquake retrofitting even though the school is near a fault, the Life Sciences complex is kind of a mess, they charge for everything (including stuff that should be for free.) I didn't mention that SDSU President Adela de la Torre now makes nearly half a million a year and lives for free in a house in La Jolla (all of the SDSU Presidents have lived there during their tenures for the last few decades) actually the house is in a gated community nearby the campus, and they actually bought de la Torre a new one in 2018, before she showed up.
*Example of the nonsense:
MaelstromTempest
·
10 hr. ago
Honestly really poor journalism. While it does point out some legitimate issues regarding the need for library funding, the article reeks of resentment and grandstanding. It adds nothing to these discussions except speculation and hearsay with evidence being anecdotal at best. Overall writing is very bad. Never would have flown in an RWS 100 class that’s for sure haha.
6 upvotes
GhostofHeywood12
OP
·
9 hr. ago
I was quoting SDSU professor Peter Herman on the library, you were too lazy to click the links.
-4 downvotes
MaelstromTempest
·
2 hr. ago
And I pointed out that the issue about the library was about the only legitimate claim made in the article.
3 upvotes
GhostofHeywood12
OP
·
2 hr. ago
What about Life Science North? They want to completely replace it, and it is the newer part of the Life Sciences complex. That was mentioned. I didn't mention that the SDSU president now makes about a half-million dollars, and lives rent-free in a gated estate near the college. links in original
-1 downvote
MaelstromTempest
·
1 hr. ago
What about the life sciences building? The article says that it’s an old beat up building, so I guess it should be replaced then? But it doesn’t matter because as you say funding hasn’t been secured so I’m not even sure why that was a point. Is the article for or against it? Who knows, because the writing is god awful. And yes, the SDSU president’s salary is a matter of public record, as well as her housing allowance and the house the university purchased for her. So what? Such arrangements are common throughout various organizations, whether they be public, private, or non-profit. There are absolutely criticisms about the current SDSU president, but again, the reader wouldn’t know about it because of how low level the journalism is.
1 vote
GhostofHeywood12
OP
·
2 hr. ago
Voting me down will not change that.
-3 downvotes
https://www.reddit.com/r/SDSU/comments/ ... ego_state/