Nah, me neither. Unless you meant the terrorist, and he's long dead.
How about now......
It's on the front page of Wikipedia right now.American astronaut Michael Collins (pictured), the command module pilot for Apollo 11, dies at the age of 90.
Hmmm. Well, Ok, but I watched the film, and I still don't really know who he was. No wait, was this the mission where Tom Hanks shat his pants?
I kid. But seriously, be honest, you didn't know who Collins was, and even now, you probably still don't know. Or really care.
Despite this not being "In the News" in the way other events on that section usually are, because lets face it, to anyone but his family and space nerds, which Wikipedia attracts like flies on shit, nobody really gives a shit that this old man has died of natural causes.
What I want you to observe, and laugh at.....
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?ti ... el_Collins
.....is how predictable it was to see that when this was being debated, specifically, whether it should be noted here on the front page of Wikipedia, there was of course, a huge argument, with nobody able to agree what the purpose of "In The News" even is. Even though the title is kind of a clue. No matter though, both sides were adamant that they were correct, and thought that the other side was insane to think otherwise. Pricks like Lugnuts were there, being pricks, obviously oblivious to the fact he is supposed to be retired. Prick.
Ah, Wikipedia consensus. It was decided, as usual, by an Administrator just sweeping in and contemptuously placing a super vote.
This same argument, with typically the same ending, has played out on Wikipedia for years. They're that crazy. Not for them, a final settlement to decided what that section is for.
Still, this one was at least funny for seeing this claim to fame surface, something that only an absolute wiki nerd could have come up with.....
Lolwut?the first human to be out of sensory communication with the Earth